| Literature DB >> 19672408 |
Florence Eustache1, Françoise Mondon, Marie Chantal Canivenc-Lavier, Corinne Lesaffre, Yvonne Fulla, Raymond Berges, Jean Pierre Cravedi, Daniel Vaiman, Jacques Auger.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reproductive consequences and mechanisms of action of chronic exposure to low-dose endocrine disruptors are poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: antiandrogen; endocrine disruption; mRNA; male reproduction; phytoestrogen; spermatozoa; toxicology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19672408 PMCID: PMC2721872 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0800158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Effects of treatments on mating and fertility in adult rats at PND80.
| Treatment
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Control | G1 | G10 | V1 | V30 | G1 + V1 | G10 +V30 |
| Mating index (%) | 83 | 100 | 83 | 67 | 83 | 50 | 83 |
| Fertility index (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 100 |
| Litter size (mean ± SD) | 13.0 ± 1.6 | 7.3 ± 4.0 | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 11.3 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 4.1 | 5.3 ± 1.5 | 8.8 ± 2.8 |
| Pup weight (mean ± SD) | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.6 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 1.1 |
| Sex ratio at birth | 0.508 | 0.591 | 0.436 | 0.644 | 0.663 | 0.625 | 0.455 |
| Postimplantation loss (%) | 1.5 | 8.2 | 12.5 | 9.8 | 44.4 | 10.5 | 13.5 |
Number of mated females/number of females × 100.
Number of pregnant females/number of mated females × 100.
Total number of males/total number of pups.
High value mainly due to one female with no pups but 11 implantation sites.
Tendency, but not significant (p < 0.10).
p < 0.05, and
p < 0.01 compared with controls.
Developmental anomalies, incidence of reproductive malformations, and reproductive organ weights in adult rats.
| Treatment
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | Control | G1 | G10 | V1 | V30 | G1 + V1 | G10 + V30 |
| Development | |||||||
| Anogenital distance [mean ± SD (mm)] | 19.4 ± 0.8 | 20.0 ± 1.1 | 19.7 ± 0.9 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | 17.5 ± 0.7 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | 18.0 ± 1.0 |
| Immature penile development | 1/5 | 1/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| Hypospadias (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (24) | 0 (0) | 2 (10) |
| Cryptorchidism (%) | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | 3 (13) | 0 (0) | 3 (10) | 1 (5) | 0 (0) |
| Epididymal anomalies (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 1 (3) | 4 (19) | 0 (0) |
| Other (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 2 (7) | 0 (0) | 1 (5) |
| Overall incidence of anomalies (%) | 1 (4) | 2 (8) | 3 (13) | 2 (8) | 13 (44) | 5 (24) | 3 (15) |
| Organ weight (mean ± SE) | |||||||
| Body (g) | 309 ± 7 | 350 ± 7 | 333 ± 6 | 327 ± 8 | 320 ± 5 | 322 ± 9 | 335 ± 6 |
| Testis | 9.7 ± 0.3 | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 9.9 ± 0.3 | 9.9 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 0.3 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 10.6 ± 0.2 |
| Epididymis | 1.56 ± 0.07 | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 1.36 ± 0.07 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 1.21 ± 0.09 | 1.16 ± 0.06 | 1.30 ± 0.04 |
| Seminal vesicles | 3.54 ± 0.26 | 3.26 ± 0.18 | 3.24 ± 0.20 | 3.20 ± 0.15 | 2.78 ± 0.11 | 2.93 ± 0.12 | 2.93 ± 0.17 |
| Ventral prostate | 2.28 ± 0.14 | 2.19 ± 0.09 | 2.14 ± 0.13 | 2.08 ± 0.11 | 1.90 ± 0.07 | 2.22 ± 0.14 | 1.92 ± 0.11 |
| Liver | 30.9 ± 0.7 | 31.7 ± 0.8 | 33.1 ± 0.5 | 30.8 ± 0.6 | 31.5 ± 0.7 | 28.9 ± 0.7 | 30.9 ± 0.5 |
Measurements and observations on PND25 for five randomly selected animals from each group.
Macroscopically irregular, cystic, and/or enlarged epididymis.
Micropenis.
Two pups from the same litter had multiple anomalies: sexual ambiguity, abnormal seminal vesicles, and absence of vas deferens.
Sexual ambiguity.
Relative weights (g/kg).
Tendency, but not significant (p < 0.10).
p < 0.05, and
p < 0.01 compared with controls.
Figure 1Box plot displaying 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile values, and the mean value (thick line) of sperm progressive motility (A), STR (B), and VCL (C) in rats on PND80.
**p < 0.05, #p < 0.01, ##p < 0.005, and †p < 0.001, compared with controls.
Figure 2Box plot displaying 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile values and the mean value (thick line) of epididymal (cauda) sperm number in rats on PND80. The most pronounced differences in sperm count compared with controls were in the V30 and G1 + V1 groups.
**p < 0.05 compared with controls.
Figure 3Number of testicular genes modified by the various exposures. C, control. The threshold relative to the controls was > 2.
Gene representation and main KEGG pathways identified in the groups defined after the hierarchical clustering of the data from testis cDNA.
| Cluster | No. of transcripts | No. of genes | No. of genes(excluding ill-characterized genes) | No. of olfactory-receptor–encoding genes (%) | Main KEGG pathway | Secondary KEGG pathway | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 9,401 | 8,739 | 5,200 | 115 (1.2) | Insulin signaling | 5.0 × 10−3 | ||
| Group 2 | 522 | 494 | 369 | 4 (0.8) | Fructose and mannose metabolism | 9.5 × 10−4 | Neoglucogenesis | 1.5 × 10−3 |
| Group 3 | 2,481 | 2,405 | 1,422 | 268 (10.8) | Neuroactive ligand/receptor interaction | 5.4 × 10−13 | Calcium signaling | 2.6 × 10−4 |
| Group 4 | 2,801 | 2,695 | 1,521 | 684 (24.4) | Neuroactive ligand/receptor interaction | 3.0 × 10−25 | Calcium signaling | 1.6 × 10−6 |
| Group 5 | 1,123 | 1,076 | 815 | 3 (0.3) | Ribosome | 4.3 × 10−14 | ||
| Group 6 | 469 | 431 | 431 | 4 (0.9) | Ribosome | 1.4 × 10−9 | ||
| Group 7 | 6,096 | 5,727 | 3,788 | 200 (3.2) | GnRH signaling pathway | 1.0 × 10−3 | Colorectal cancer | 4.3 × 10−3 |
| Renin–angiotensin system | 1.2 × 10−2 | |||||||
| MAPK signaling | 1.2 × 10−2 |
Abbreviations: GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase.
Excluding genes labeled LOC or RGD.
Figure 4Nonsupervised hierarchical classification revealing seven gene clusters according to the various exposure protocols. C, control. A number of genes were down-regulated by G1 relative to the control (cluster 1). Cluster 2 includes genes induced by G10 and by G10 + V30. Cluster 3 genes were weakly induced by G1 + V1, V1, and V30. Some genes were induced by all the treatments, especially by G1 + V1 and V30 (cluster 4). Cluster 5 contains genes strongly expressed in the control and not modified by G1, all other treatments decreasing their expression. Several genes in cluster 6 were induced specifically by G1. Cluster 7 consists of essentially genes weakly induced by G1 and G10.