Literature DB >> 19672328

Why Do Different Individuals Progress Along Different Life Trajectories?

Gregory T Smith1.   

Abstract

The core marker of progress in psychological science is the degree to which our work enhances the welfare of people. In order to effectively enhance human welfare, we must develop comprehensive models that explain why different individuals progress along different life trajectories. Exciting theoretical accounts that describe transitional processes from gene polymorphisms through moment-to-moment behavior are beginning to emerge. These early accounts highlight opportunities to investigate specific transitional steps along that long pathway, the need to understand the universal and the contextual aspects of psychological processes, and the need to define and measure psychological constructs with more precision and clarity. It is likely that creative new research in each of these areas will bring enormous progress over the coming decade.
© 2009 Association for Psychological Science.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672328      PMCID: PMC2724016          DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01148.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  31 in total

Review 1.  Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?

Authors:  Steven J Heine; Darrin R Lehman; Hazel Rose Markus; Shinobu Kitayama
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  An exploration of cultural variation in self-enhancing and self-improving motivations.

Authors:  Steven J Heine
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Toward an integrative science of the person.

Authors:  Walter Mischel
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Beyond invulnerability: the importance of benefits in adolescents' decision to drink alcohol.

Authors:  Julie H Goldberg; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher; Susan G Millstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know?

Authors:  Ara Norenzayan; Steven J Heine
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Heterogeneity of risk aggregation for alcohol problems between early and middle childhood: nesting structure variations.

Authors:  M M Wong; R A Zucker; L I Puttler; H E Fitzgerald
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  1999

7.  Serotonin transporter promoter gain-of-function genotypes are linked to obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Xian-Zhang Hu; Robert H Lipsky; Guanshan Zhu; Longina A Akhtar; Julie Taubman; Benjamin D Greenberg; Ke Xu; Paul D Arnold; Margaret A Richter; James L Kennedy; Dennis L Murphy; David Goldman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  An expanded evaluation of the relationship of four alleles to the level of response to alcohol and the alcoholism risk.

Authors:  Xianzhang Hu; Gabor Oroszi; Jeffrey Chun; Tom L Smith; David Goldman; Marc A Schuckit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Conceptual complexity and construct validity.

Authors:  Robert E McGrath
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2005-10

10.  Heritability of individual depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Kerry L Jang; W John Livesley; Steven Taylor; Murray B Stein; Erin C Moon
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.839

View more
  1 in total

1.  The enduring impact of borderline personality pathology: risk for threatening life events in later middle-age.

Authors:  Marci E J Gleason; Abigail D Powers; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-10-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.