Literature DB >> 19672195

Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.

Frank Michael Digeser1, Torsten Wohlberedt, Ulrich Hoppe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of spectrotemporal properties of naturally produced consonant-vowel syllables to speech-evoked auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) for stimuli with very similar or even identical wide-band envelopes. Speech-evoked ERPs may be useful for validating the neural representation of speech.
DESIGN: Speech-evoked ERPs were obtained from 10 normal-hearing young adults in response to the syllables /da/ and /ta/. Both monosyllables were obtained from ongoing speech. They have quite similar wide-band envelopes, and they mainly differ in the spectrotemporal content of the consonant parts. Additionally, each stimulus derivatives were investigated with (1) isolated consonant part ("consonant stimulus"), (2) isolated vowel part ("vowel stimulus"), and (3) removed spectral information but identical wide-band envelope. Latencies and amplitudes of the N1 and P2 components were determined and analyzed.
RESULTS: ERPs in response to the naturally produced /ta/ syllable had significant shorter N1 and P2 latencies and larger amplitudes than ERPs in response to /da/. Similar differences were observed for the ERPs evoked by the consonant stimuli alone. For the vowel stimuli and stimuli with removed spectral information, no significant differences were observed. In summary, differences between the ERPs of /da/ and /ta/ corresponded to the distinct spectrotemporal content in the consonant parts of the original consonant-vowel (CV) syllables.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that even small differences in spectrotemporal features of speech may evoke different ERPs, despite very similar or even identical wide-band envelopes. The results are consistent with a model that ERPs evoked by short CVs are an onset response to the consonant merged with an acoustic change complex evoked by the vowel part. However, all components appear as one P1-N1-P2 complex. The results may be explained by differences in the narrow-band envelopes of the stimuli. Therefore, this study underlines the limitations of the wide-band envelope in explaining speech-evoked ERPs. Additionally, the results of this study are of special interest for clinical application since some of the ERP parameter differences, as the N1 latency, are present not only in the ERPs of each single subject but also in the group mean value of all N1 latencies. Thus, presented ERP measurements in response to CVs might be used for identification of potential problems in phoneme differentiation caused by spectrotemporal analysis problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672195     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b1d42d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Acoustic Change Complex and Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination Measures of Vowel Contrast Detection.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone; Spencer Smith; Diane E Cheek Smith
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Prediction of Speech Intelligibility by Means of EEG Responses to Sentences in Noise.

Authors:  Jan Muncke; Ivine Kuruvila; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Words and melody are intertwined in perception of sung words: EEG and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Reyna L Gordon; Daniele Schön; Cyrille Magne; Corine Astésano; Mireille Besson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Representation of spectro-temporal features of spoken words within the P1-N1-P2 and T-complex of the auditory evoked potentials (AEP).

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Arindam Roychoudhury; Luca Campanelli; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Yaminah D Carter; J Michelle Njoroge; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Speech Perception with Noise Vocoding and Background Noise: An EEG and Behavioral Study.

Authors:  Yue Dong; Yan Gai
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-13

7.  Speech token detection and discrimination in individual infants using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Darren Mao; Julia Wunderlich; Borislav Savkovic; Emily Jeffreys; Namita Nicholls; Onn Wah Lee; Michael Eager; Colette M McKay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for differences between fusion and combination illusions in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Alma Lindborg; Tobias S Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.386

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.