UNLABELLED: BACKGROUNDPostoperative pain Is an independent predictor of postoperative delirium. Whether postoperative delirium limits patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use has not been determined. METHODS: The authors conducted a nested cohort study in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and used PCA for postoperative analgesia. Delirium was measured by using the Confusion Assessment Method. The authors computed a structural equation model to determine the effects of pain and opioid consumption on delirium status and the effect of delirium on opioid use. RESULTS: Of 335 patients, 108 (32.2%) developed delirium on postoperative day (POD) 1, and 120 (35.8%) on POD 2. Postoperative delirium did not limit the use of PCA. Patients with postoperative delirium used more PCA in a 24-h period (POD 2) compared to those without delirium (mean dose of hydromorphone +/- SE adjusted for covariates was 2.24 +/- 0.71 mg vs. 1.25 +/- 0.67 mg, P = 0.02). Despite more opioid use, patients with delirium reported higher Visual Analogue Scale scores than those without delirium (POD 1: mean visual analog scale +/- SE at rest 4.2 +/- 0.23 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.22, P = 0.0051; POD 2: 3.3 +/- 0.23 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.19, P = 0.004). Path coefficients from structural equation model revealed that pain and opioid use affect delirium status, but delirium does not affect subsequent opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative delirium did not limit PCA use. Despite more opioid use, visual analog scale scores were higher in patients with delirium. Future studies on delirium should consider the role of pain and pain management as potential etiologic factors.
UNLABELLED: BACKGROUNDPostoperative pain Is an independent predictor of postoperative delirium. Whether postoperative delirium limits patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use has not been determined. METHODS: The authors conducted a nested cohort study in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and used PCA for postoperative analgesia. Delirium was measured by using the Confusion Assessment Method. The authors computed a structural equation model to determine the effects of pain and opioid consumption on delirium status and the effect of delirium on opioid use. RESULTS: Of 335 patients, 108 (32.2%) developed delirium on postoperative day (POD) 1, and 120 (35.8%) on POD 2. Postoperative delirium did not limit the use of PCA. Patients with postoperative delirium used more PCA in a 24-h period (POD 2) compared to those without delirium (mean dose of hydromorphone +/- SE adjusted for covariates was 2.24 +/- 0.71 mg vs. 1.25 +/- 0.67 mg, P = 0.02). Despite more opioid use, patients with delirium reported higher Visual Analogue Scale scores than those without delirium (POD 1: mean visual analog scale +/- SE at rest 4.2 +/- 0.23 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.22, P = 0.0051; POD 2: 3.3 +/- 0.23 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.19, P = 0.004). Path coefficients from structural equation model revealed that pain and opioid use affect delirium status, but delirium does not affect subsequent opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative delirium did not limit PCA use. Despite more opioid use, visual analog scale scores were higher in patients with delirium. Future studies on delirium should consider the role of pain and pain management as potential etiologic factors.
Authors: Kim A Eagle; Peter B Berger; Hugh Calkins; Bernard R Chaitman; Gordon A Ewy; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Lee A Fleisher; James B Froehlich; Richard J Gusberg; Jeffrey A Leppo; Thomas Ryan; Robert C Schlant; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Loren F Hiratzka; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Michael C Rowbotham; Lisa Twilling; Pamela S Davies; Lori Reisner; Kirk Taylor; David Mohr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D A O'Hara; A Duff; J A Berlin; R M Poses; V A Lawrence; E C Huber; H Noveck; B L Strom; J L Carson Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: R Sean Morrison; Jay Magaziner; Marvin Gilbert; Kenneth J Koval; Mary Ann McLaughlin; Gretchen Orosz; Elton Strauss; Albert L Siu Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Susan V Bukata; Benedict F Digiovanni; Susan M Friedman; Harry Hoyen; Amy Kates; Stephen L Kates; Simon C Mears; Daniel A Mendelson; Fernando H Serna; Frederick E Sieber; Wakenda K Tyler Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2011-01
Authors: Jacqueline M Leung; Laura P Sands; Eunjung Lim; Tiffany L Tsai; Sakura Kinjo Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Niccolò Terrando; Marek Brzezinski; Vincent Degos; Lars I Eriksson; Joel H Kramer; Jacqueline M Leung; Bruce L Miller; William W Seeley; Susana Vacas; Michael W Weiner; Kristine Yaffe; William L Young; Zhongcong Xie; Mervyn Maze Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 7.616