Literature DB >> 19671688

Small interfering RNA-directed knockdown of uracil DNA glycosylase induces apoptosis and sensitizes human prostate cancer cells to genotoxic stress.

Sai Murali Krishna Pulukuri1, James A Knost, Norman Estes, Jasti S Rao.   

Abstract

Uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) is the primary enzyme responsible for removing uracil residues from DNA. Although a substantial body of evidence suggests that DNA damage plays a role in cancer cell apoptosis, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In particular, very little is known about the role of base excision repair of misincorporated uracil in cell survival. To test the hypothesis that the repair of DNA damage associated with uracil misincorporation is critical for cancer cell survival, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to target the human UNG gene. In a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner, siRNA specifically inhibited UNG expression and modified the expression of several genes at both mRNA and protein levels. In LNCaP cells, p53, p21, and Bax protein levels increased, whereas Bcl2 levels decreased. In DU145 cells, p21 levels were elevated, although mutant p53 and Bax levels remained unchanged. In PC3 cells, UNG inhibition resulted in elevated p21 and Bax levels. In all three cell lines, UNG inhibition reduced cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and increased cellular sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Furthermore, an in vitro cleavage experiment using uracil-containing double-stranded DNA as a template has shown that siRNA-mediated knockdown of UNG expression significantly reduced the uracil-excising activity of UNG in human prostate cancer cells, which was associated with DNA damage analyzed by comet assay. Taken together, these findings indicate that RNA interference-directed targeting of UNG is a convenient, novel tool for studying the biological role of UNG and raises the potential of its application for prostate cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671688      PMCID: PMC2730435          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  44 in total

Review 1.  Quality control by DNA repair.

Authors:  T Lindahl; R D Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  p53 modulates base excision repair activity in a cell cycle-specific manner after genotoxic stress.

Authors:  H Offer; I Zurer; G Banfalvi; M Reha'k; A Falcovitz; M Milyavsky; N Goldfinger; V Rotter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  p53 regulation of DNA excision repair pathways.

Authors:  Martin L Smith; Young R Seo
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Base excision repair in a network of defence and tolerance.

Authors:  H Nilsen; H E Krokan
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Differential expression of cell death regulators in response to thapsigargin and adriamycin in Bcl-2 transfected DU145 prostatic cancer cells.

Authors:  K S Chaudhary; P D Abel; G W Stamp; E Lalani
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  hUNG2 is the major repair enzyme for removal of uracil from U:A matches, U:G mismatches, and U in single-stranded DNA, with hSMUG1 as a broad specificity backup.

Authors:  Bodil Kavli; Ottar Sundheim; Mansour Akbari; Marit Otterlei; Hilde Nilsen; Frank Skorpen; Per Arne Aas; Lars Hagen; Hans E Krokan; Geir Slupphaug
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease.

Authors:  Marcus S Cooke; Mark D Evans; Miral Dizdaroglu; Joseph Lunec
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Uracil in DNA--occurrence, consequences and repair.

Authors:  Hans E Krokan; Finn Drabløs; Geir Slupphaug
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Impairment of the DNA repair and growth arrest pathways by p53R2 silencing enhances DNA damage-induced apoptosis in a p53-dependent manner in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Hong-Lin Devlin; Phillip C Mack; Rebekah A Burich; Paul H Gumerlock; Hsing-Jien Kung; Maria Mudryj; Ralph W deVere White
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  Imbalancing the DNA base excision repair pathway in the mitochondria; targeting and overexpressing N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase in mitochondria leads to enhanced cell killing.

Authors:  Melissa L Fishel; Young R Seo; Martin L Smith; Mark R Kelley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  13 in total

1.  Integration of magnetic separation and real-time ligation chain reaction for detection of uracil-DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Jinying Liu; Jiangyan Zhang; Meiqi Chen; Dehui Qiu; Xuechong Lv; Qi Jiang; Yongqiang Cheng
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase expression determines human lung cancer cell sensitivity to pemetrexed.

Authors:  Lachelle D Weeks; Pingfu Fu; Stanton L Gerson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Uracil DNA N-glycosylase promotes assembly of human centromere protein A.

Authors:  Samantha G Zeitlin; Brian R Chapados; Norman M Baker; Caroline Tai; Geir Slupphaug; Jean Y J Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) loss enhances DNA double strand break formation in human cancer cells exposed to pemetrexed.

Authors:  L D Weeks; G E Zentner; P C Scacheri; S L Gerson
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  Vpr expression abolishes the capacity of HIV-1 infected cells to repair uracilated DNA.

Authors:  Patrick Eldin; Nathalie Chazal; David Fenard; Eric Bernard; Jean-François Guichou; Laurence Briant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Tackling the tumor microenvironment: what challenge does it pose to anticancer therapies?

Authors:  Fei Chen; Xinyi Qi; Min Qian; Yue Dai; Yu Sun
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 7.  The Importance of ncRNAs as Epigenetic Mechanisms in Phenotypic Variation and Organic Evolution.

Authors:  Daniel Frías-Lasserre; Cristian A Villagra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Age-Dependent Protective Effect of Selenium against UVA Irradiation in Primary Human Keratinocytes and the Associated DNA Repair Signature.

Authors:  C Favrot; D Beal; E Blouin; M T Leccia; A M Roussel; W Rachidi
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Chemopreventive Potential of Ethanolic Extracts of Luobuma Leaves (Apocynum venetum L.) in Androgen Insensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Szu-Ping Huang; Tzu-Ming Ho; Chih-Wen Yang; Ya-Ju Chang; Jie-Fu Chen; Ning-Sing Shaw; Jia-Cherng Horng; Shih-Lan Hsu; Ming-Yuan Liao; Li-Chen Wu; Ja-An Annie Ho
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Inhibitors of DNA Glycosylases as Prospective Drugs.

Authors:  Grigory V Mechetin; Anton V Endutkin; Evgeniia A Diatlova; Dmitry O Zharkov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.