Literature DB >> 19671649

Ethical analysis of non-medical fetal ultrasound.

John Lai Yin Leung1, Samantha Mei Che Pang.   

Abstract

Obstetric ultrasound is the well-recognized prenatal test used to visualize and determine the condition of a pregnant woman and her fetus. Apart from the clinical application, some businesses have started promoting the use of fetal ultrasound machines for nonmedical reasons. Non-medical fetal ultrasound (also known as 'keepsake' ultrasound) is defined as using ultrasound to view, take a picture, or determine the sex of a fetus without a medical indication. Notwithstanding the guidelines and warnings regarding ultrasound safety issued by governments and professional bodies, the absence of scientifically proven physical harm to fetuses from this procedure seems to provide these businesses with grounds for rapid expansion. However, this argument is too simplistic because current epidemiological evidence is not synchronous with advancing ultrasound technology. As non-medical fetal ultrasound has aroused very significant public attention, a thorough ethical analysis of this topic is essential. Using a multifaceted approach, we analyse the ethical perspective of non-medical fetal ultrasound in terms of the expectant mother, the fetus and health professionals. After applying four major theories of ethics and principles (the precautionary principle; theories of consequentialism and impartiality; duty-based theory; and rights-based theories), we conclude that obstetric ultrasound practice is ethically justifiable only if the indication for its use is based on medical evidence. Non-medical fetal ultrasound can be considered ethically unjustifiable. Nevertheless, the ethical analysis of this issue is time dependent owing to rapid advancements in ultrasound technology and the safety issue. The role of health professionals in ensuring that obstetric ultrasound is an ethically justifiable practice is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671649     DOI: 10.1177/0969733009106655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  4 in total

1.  Perception of male gender preference among pregnant igbo women.

Authors:  Cc Ohagwu; Cu Eze; Jc Eze; Mc Odo; Po Abu; Ci Ohagwu
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-03

2.  Desire for prenatal gender disclosure among primigravidae in Enugu, Nigeria.

Authors:  Tochukwu C Okeke; Jamike O Enwereji; Onyemaechi S Okoro; Eric S Iferikigwe; Lawrence C Ikeako; Cyril C Ezenyeaku; Charles O Adiri
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  'Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can't see everything': a qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Margareta Persson; Ann Lalos; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Two sides of the same coin--an interview study of Swedish obstetricians' experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Margareta Persson; Kristina Edvardsson; Ann Lalos; Sophie Graner; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.