Literature DB >> 19671581

Minimal extracorporeal circulation and off-pump compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary surgery.

Gerald F V Panday1, Sven Fischer, Adrian Bauer, Dietrich Metz, Jens Schubel, Nagi El Shouki, Thomas Eberle, Harald Hausmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) and off-pump surgery are equal or better alternatives to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB) regarding perioperative morbidity, use of blood and blood products and completeness of revascularization, CCPB is still being used in the majority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We investigated 1472 CABG operations in our center. A total of 1143 CABG operations were performed using CCPB, 220 using MECC and 109 were performed as off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). All patients were recorded prospectively. Perioperative follow-up was focused on the occurrence of arrhythmia, neurocognitive disorders and the need of blood and blood products. Operative mortality rates were comparable in all three groups. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.2+/-0.6 in the MECC group, 3.4+/-0.7 in the CCPB group and 1.9+/-0.8 in the OPCAB group (P=0.01). Arrhythmia occurred in 25% of the MECC group and in 35.6% of the CCPB group (P=0.05). Arrhythmia occurred in 21.7% of the OPCAB group. Seven patients (3%) of the MECC group suffered neurocognitive disorders perioperatively compared to 74 (7%) patients of the CCPB group (P=0.05) and three patients of the OPCAB group (3%). The median number of blood transfusions per patient was 0.8 in the MECC group, 1.8 in the CCPB group and 0.8 in the OPCAB group (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative morbidity of MECC and OPCAB is comparable to or even less in comparison to CCPB. MECC allows CABG surgery in cardiac arrest so that completeness of revascularization is being warranted and longer patency rates can be guaranteed. Furthermore, the use of blood and blood products is significantly less in MECC surgery so that MECC should be considered first choice in CABG surgery over CCPB and OPCAB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671581     DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.206466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  6 in total

Review 1.  Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS).

Authors:  Kyriakos Anastasiadis; John Murkin; Polychronis Antonitsis; Adrian Bauer; Marco Ranucci; Erich Gygax; Jan Schaarschmidt; Yves Fromes; Alois Philipp; Balthasar Eberle; Prakash Punjabi; Helena Argiriadou; Alexander Kadner; Hansjoerg Jenni; Guenter Albrecht; Wim van Boven; Andreas Liebold; Fillip de Somer; Harald Hausmann; Apostolos Deliopoulos; Aschraf El-Essawi; Valerio Mazzei; Fausto Biancari; Adam Fernandez; Patrick Weerwind; Thomas Puehler; Cyril Serrick; Frans Waanders; Serdar Gunaydin; Sunil Ohri; Jan Gummert; Gianni Angelini; Volkmar Falk; Thierry Carrel
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-26

2.  Haemostasis alterations in coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison between the off-pump technique and a closed coated cardiopulmonary bypass system.

Authors:  Giuseppe Scrascia; Crescenzia Rotunno; Piero Guida; Manuela Conte; Lillà Amorese; Vito Margari; Luigi de Luca Tupputi Schinosa; Domenico Paparella
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

3.  Comparison of two technics of cardiopulmonary bypass (conventional and mini CPB) in the trans-and postoperative periods of cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sergio Nunes Pereira; Izabelle Balta Zumba; Micheline Sulzbacher Batista; Daniela da Pieve; Elisandra dos Santos; Ralf Stuermer; Gerson Pereira de Oliveira; Roberta Senger
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

4.  Less invasive coronary artery revascularization with a minimized extracorporeal circulation system: preliminary results of a comparative study with off-pump-procedures.

Authors:  Thorsten Wittwer; Anton Sabashnikov; Parwis B Rahmanian; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Mohamed Zeriouh; Thorsten O Mehler; Thorsten Wahlers
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Effects of Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Mediastinal Drainage and the Use of Blood Products in the Intensive Care Unit in 60- to 80-Year-Old Patients Who Have Undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Fatih Aygün; Mehmet Özülkü; Murat Günday
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Analysis of Myocardial Ischemia Parameters after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation and a Novel Microplegia versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Luca Koechlin; Urs Zenklusen; Thomas Doebele; Bejtush Rrahmani; Brigitta Gahl; Thibault Schaeffer; Denis Berdajs; Friedrich S Eckstein; Oliver Reuthebuch
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 4.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.