Literature DB >> 19671427

Exploratory clinical trials: implementation modes & guidelines, scope and regulatory framework.

Alain Francillon1, Gisèle Pickering, Chantal Belorgey.   

Abstract

The working group focused on defining exploratory trials on medicinal products and developing recommendations for their implementation in France (notably concerning non-clinical requirements, the pharmaceutical quality of the investigational medical product and the conditions under which this type of clinical trial may be performed).To this end, the working group took account of existing guidelines (notably those in the USA and Belgium) and a draft revision of the ICH M3 guideline.Exploratory trials are clinical trials performed early in Phase I, prior to dose escalation and safety and tolerability trials. These trials are de facto first-in-man studies but lack a therapeutic or diagnostic goal and do not seek to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The objective is to answer precise questions which condition the continuation or suspension of the drug's development program. Exploratory trials include a small number of patients or healthy subjects and expose them (over a short period of time) to a low dose of an investigational medicinal product.The draft revision of M3 describes five approaches (two involving microdoses and three with pharmacological doses).The group's main recommendations can be summarized as follows:An exploratory trial may be performed when it is (i) justified, (ii) useful for product development and (iii) consistent with prerequisites. The pharmaceutical dossier should take account of the low quantity of product available, the short period of product administration and the low doses used. Good Manufacturing Practices can be adapted accordingly. The non-clinical dossier should also be adapted to suit the development phase and particular features of product use. In this respect, the group has commented on the recommendations in the draft revision of M3. The protocol must be designed to provide answers to a set of specific, pertinent questions concerning this administration phase - particularly on choice of the initial dose, the size of the dose escalation and the rules for subject withdrawal and trial suspension. In general, so-called "vulnerable" populations should not be involved in this type of trial, apart from duly justified exceptions. The group considered that approaches 3 to 5 should only apply to a medicinal product intended for treatment of a severe or rare disease or a condition with significant unmet medical needs. Pre-filing at the Afssaps (the French Agency for Healthcare Product Safety) is recommended, notably for approaches using pharmacological doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671427     DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2009022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  3 in total

Review 1.  From promising molecules to orphan drugs: Early clinical drug development.

Authors:  Marc Dooms
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2017-02

2.  Older adults in phase I clinical trials: a comparative analysis of participation and clinical benefit rate among older adults versus middle age and AYA patients on phase I clinical trials with VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors.

Authors:  Ishwaria M Subbiah; Chad Tang; Arvind Rao; Gerald S Falchook; Vivek Subbiah; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Daniel Karp; Razelle Kurzrock; David S Hong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-22

3.  Dose selection for intracerebroventricular cerliponase alfa in children with CLN2 disease, translation from animal to human in a rare genetic disease.

Authors:  Kevin Hammon; Greg de Hart; Brian R Vuillemenot; Derek Kennedy; Don Musson; Charles A O'Neill; Martin L Katz; Joshua W Henshaw
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.689

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.