Literature DB >> 19671227

Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies.

Kevin C Zorn1, Mark A Wille, Alan E Thong, Mark H Katz, Sergey A Shikanov, Aria Razmaria, Ofer N Gofrit, Gregory P Zagaja, Arieh L Shalhav.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) series have reviewed the impact of the initial learning curve on perioperative outcomes. However, little is known about the impact of experience on urinary and sexual outcomes. Herein, we review the perioperative, pathological and functional outcomes of our initial 700 consecutive procedures with at least 1 year follow up.
METHODS: From 2003-2006, 700 consecutive men underwent RARP at a single, academic institution. Perioperative data and pathologic outcomes were prospectively collected. Validated, UCLA-PCI-SF36v2 quality-of-life questionnaires were also obtained at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following surgery. Outcomes between groups (cases 1-300, 301-500, and 501-700) were compared.
RESULTS: Mean operative time (OT) and blood loss significantly decreased during the experience (286, 198, 190 min; p <or= 0.001; 266, 190, 169 ml; p <or=0.001). Positive surgical margin (PSM) rate decreased in pT2 patients (15% versus 10% versus 7%; p = 0.03) despite operating on men with higher grade disease (biopsy GS>or=7 in 24%, 40%, 44%; p <or= 0.001). At 12 months postRARP, pad free continence rate was 81% when self reported and 62% when assessed by the UCLA-PCI-SF36v2 questionnaire in the initial group. Continence rates improved to 93% and 75%, respectively, for cases 501-700 (p <or= 0.05). Furthermore, significant improvement in continence rates between consecutive case groups was observed at all postoperative time points. Potency rate was 83% (bilateral nerve preservation) and 56% (unilateral nerve preservation) at 12 months when self reported and 63% and 37% respectively by the UCLA-PCI-SF36v2. No significant differences in sexual function were noted with increased experience.
CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged learning curve is observed for EBL, OT and pT2-PSM. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is first series demonstrating a continued improvement in urinary continence with increased RARP experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  17 in total

1.  Radiation therapy in prostate cancer: a risk-adapted strategy.

Authors:  A J Hayden; C Catton; T Pickles
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new concept or a waste of time?

Authors:  Nicolas Koutlidis; Céline Duperron; Mathilde Funes de la Vega; Eric Mourey; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised?

Authors:  Luchen Wang; Mireya Diaz; Hans Stricker; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

5.  The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Joseph J Pariser; Sanjay G Patel; Blake B Anderson; Scott E Eggener; Gregory P Zagaja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC180 suture.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  [Prevention of postprostatectomy incontinence: etiology and risk factors].

Authors:  R Mager; M Kurosch; T Hüsch; M Reiter; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Functional outcomes of clinically high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  F Abdollah; D Dalela; A Sood; J Sammon; R Cho; L Nocera; M Diaz; W Jeong; J O Peabody; N Fossati; G Gandaglia; A Briganti; F Montorsi; M Menon
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.

Authors:  B Calio; A Sidana; D Sugano; S Gaur; A Jain; M Maruf; S Xu; P Yan; J Kruecker; M Merino; P Choyke; B Turkbey; B Wood; P Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Ryuta Tanimoto; Yomi Fashola; Kymora B Scotland; Anne E Calvaresi; Leonard G Gomella; Edouard J Trabulsi; Costas D Lallas
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.