Literature DB >> 19670085

Matching mind to world and vice versa: Functional dissociations between belief and desire mental state processing.

Anna Abraham1, Hannes Rakoczy, Markus Werning, D Yves von Cramon, Ricarda I Schubotz.   

Abstract

With the aim of understanding how different mental or intentional states are processed in the brain, the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study examined the brain correlates during the ascription of belief intentional states relative to desire intentional states as well as the effect of incongruent relative to congruent intentional states. To this end, sentences containing scenarios were presented to participants and their task was to make judgments concerning the ascription of intentional states based on this information. Belief ascriptions, relative to desire ascriptions, were accompanied by activations in lateral prefrontal structures that include areas known to be involved in relational and conceptual reasoning. Desire ascriptions, in contrast, were accompanied by activations in regions of the medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal gyri and hippocampal formation, all of which are known for their involvement in self-referential, autobiographical and episodic memory-relevant processes. In addition, the ascription of intentional states that were incongruent with reality (false beliefs and unfulfilled desires) was compared to the ascription of intentional states that were congruent to reality (true belief and fulfilled desires). While no brain region was selectively activated during the processing of unfulfilled desires, the processing of false beliefs was associated with stronger activations in the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex, an area that has been previously linked to the process of decoupling in false belief attribution. These findings provide new insights into more fine-grained aspects of mental state reasoning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19670085     DOI: 10.1080/17470910903166853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  10 in total

1.  The false memory syndrome: experimental studies and comparison to confabulations.

Authors:  M F Mendez; I A Fras
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 2.  The multifaceted abstract brain.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Megan Reilly; Wessel van Dam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Frontolimbic affective bias and false narratives from brain disease.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Neural processing of social interaction: Coordinate-based meta-analytic evidence from human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Maria Arioli; Nicola Canessa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neural correlates of belief- and desire-reasoning in 7- and 8-year-old children: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Lindsay C Bowman; David Liu; Andrew N Meltzoff; Henry M Wellman
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-07-06

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of reading the single- and interactive-mind.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Wang; Yu-Wei Zheng; Chong-De Lin; Jie Wu; De-Li Shen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The biochemistry of belief.

Authors:  T S Sathyanarayana Rao; M R Asha; K S Jagannatha Rao; P Vasudevaraju
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Rethinking the role of the rTPJ in attention and social cognition in light of the opposing domains hypothesis: findings from an ALE-based meta-analysis and resting-state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Benjamin Kubit; Anthony I Jack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Common brain areas engaged in false belief reasoning and visual perspective taking: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies.

Authors:  Matthias Schurz; Markus Aichhorn; Anna Martin; Josef Perner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Assessing the integrity of the cognitive processes involved in belief reasoning by means of two nonverbal tasks: Rationale, normative data collection and illustration with brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  Aurélie Biervoye; Gaëlle Meert; Ian A Apperly; Dana Samson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.