PURPOSE: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (ETV-047) was conducted to evaluate the dose-response relationship of entecavir and compare its antiviral activity and safety with lamivudine in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS:One hundred thirty-seven nucleoside-naive adult patients with CHB were randomized to once-daily oral doses of entecavir 0.01, 0.1, or 0.5 mg or lamivudine 100 mg for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point used to evaluate the dose-response relationship was mean change from baseline in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level at week 22, as determined by polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS:Entecavir demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship, with mean change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level of -3.11, -4.77, and -5.16 log(10) copies/ml with entecavir 0.01, 0.1, and 0.5 mg, respectively. Entecavir 0.5 mg was superior to lamivudine 100 mg for the mean change in HBV DNA level (-5.16 vs. -4.29 log(10) copies/ml; P = 0.007). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (one with liver cirrhosis [entecavir 0.5 mg] and one with grade 4 serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, nausea, and malaise [lamivudine 100 mg]). Serum ALT flares were observed in four patients; flares were associated with 2 log(10) reductions or more in HBV DNA level and resolved without dose interruption. CONCLUSION:Entecavir 0.01-0.5 mg is well tolerated and produces a dose-dependent reduction in viral load in nucleoside-naive Japanese patients with CHB. Compared with lamivudine 100 mg, entecavir 0.1 mg demonstrated noninferiority and entecavir 0.5 mg was superior in this population.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (ETV-047) was conducted to evaluate the dose-response relationship of entecavir and compare its antiviral activity and safety with lamivudine in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven nucleoside-naive adult patients with CHB were randomized to once-daily oral doses of entecavir 0.01, 0.1, or 0.5 mg or lamivudine 100 mg for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point used to evaluate the dose-response relationship was mean change from baseline in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level at week 22, as determined by polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS:Entecavir demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship, with mean change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level of -3.11, -4.77, and -5.16 log(10) copies/ml with entecavir 0.01, 0.1, and 0.5 mg, respectively. Entecavir 0.5 mg was superior to lamivudine 100 mg for the mean change in HBV DNA level (-5.16 vs. -4.29 log(10) copies/ml; P = 0.007). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (one with liver cirrhosis [entecavir 0.5 mg] and one with grade 4 serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, nausea, and malaise [lamivudine 100 mg]). Serum ALT flares were observed in four patients; flares were associated with 2 log(10) reductions or more in HBV DNA level and resolved without dose interruption. CONCLUSION:Entecavir 0.01-0.5 mg is well tolerated and produces a dose-dependent reduction in viral load in nucleoside-naive Japanese patients with CHB. Compared with lamivudine 100 mg, entecavir 0.1 mg demonstrated noninferiority and entecavir 0.5 mg was superior in this population.
Authors: Richard J Colonno; Ronald Rose; Carl J Baldick; Steven Levine; Kevin Pokornowski; Cheng F Yu; Ann Walsh; Jie Fang; Mayla Hsu; Charles Mazzucco; Betsy Eggers; Sharon Zhang; Mary Plym; Kenneth Klesczewski; Daniel J Tenney Journal: Hepatology Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: D J Tenney; S M Levine; R E Rose; A W Walsh; S P Weinheimer; L Discotto; M Plym; K Pokornowski; C F Yu; P Angus; A Ayres; A Bartholomeusz; W Sievert; G Thompson; N Warner; S Locarnini; R J Colonno Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M I Allen; M Deslauriers; C W Andrews; G A Tipples; K A Walters; D L Tyrrell; N Brown; L D Condreay Journal: Hepatology Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Yun-Fan Liaw; Joseph J Y Sung; Wan Cheng Chow; Geoffrey Farrell; Cha-Ze Lee; Hon Yuen; Tawesak Tanwandee; Qi-Min Tao; Kelly Shue; Oliver N Keene; Jonathan S Dixon; D Fraser Gray; Jan Sabbat Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E V Genovesi; L Lamb; I Medina; D Taylor; M Seifer; S Innaimo; R J Colonno; D N Standring; J M Clark Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Stuart Mealing; Isabella Ghement; Neil Hawkins; David A Scott; Benedicte Lescrauwaet; Maureen Watt; Mark Thursz; Pietro Lampertico; Lorenzo Mantovani; Edith Morais; Bruno Bregman; Michel Cucherat Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2014-03-07