Literature DB >> 19668866

Computational model and microfluidic platform for the investigation of paracrine and autocrine signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells.

David Ellison1, Alex Munden, Andre Levchenko.   

Abstract

Autocrine and paracrine signaling mechanisms are traditionally difficult to study due to the recursive nature of the process and the sub-micromolar concentrations involved. This has proven to be especially limiting in the study of embryonic stem cells that might rely on such signaling for viability, self-renewal, and proliferation. To better characterize possible effects of autocrine and paracrine signaling in the setting of expanding stem cells, we developed a computational model assuming a critical need for cell-secreted survival factors. This model suggested that the precise way in which the removal of putative survival factors could affect stem cell survival in culture. We experimentally tested the predictions in mouse embryonic stem cells by taking advantage of a novel microfluidic device allowing removal of the cell-conditioned medium at defined time intervals. Experimental results in both serum-containing and defined N2B27 media confirmed computational model predictions, suggested existence of unknown survival factors with distinct rates of diffusion, and revealed an adaptive/selective phase in mouse embryonic stem cell response to a lack of paracrine signaling. We suggest that the described computational/experimental platform can be used to identify and study specific factors and pathways involved in a wide variety of paracrine signaling systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19668866      PMCID: PMC5561740          DOI: 10.1039/b905602e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  32 in total

1.  Introducing embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  J Nichols
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Fluid shear stress induces differentiation of Flk-1-positive embryonic stem cells into vascular endothelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  Kimiko Yamamoto; Takaaki Sokabe; Tetsuro Watabe; Kohei Miyazono; Jun K Yamashita; Syotaro Obi; Norihiko Ohura; Akiko Matsushita; Akira Kamiya; Joji Ando
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Cells on chips.

Authors:  Jamil El-Ali; Peter K Sorger; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Effective intercellular communication distances are determined by the relative time constants for cyto/chemokine secretion and diffusion.

Authors:  K Francis; B O Palsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Reflections on the biology of embryonic stem (ES) cells.

Authors:  R L Gardner; F A Brook
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.203

6.  Mouse embryonic stem cells exhibit indefinite proliferative potential.

Authors:  Y Suda; M Suzuki; Y Ikawa; S Aizawa
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Derivation of embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  S J Abbondanzo; I Gadi; C L Stewart
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  LIF-mediated control of embryonic stem cell self-renewal emerges due to an autoregulatory loop.

Authors:  Ryan E Davey; Kento Onishi; Alborz Mahdavi; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  The ribosomal S6 kinases, cAMP-responsive element-binding, and STAT3 proteins are regulated by different leukemia inhibitory factor signaling pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  H Boeuf; K Merienne; S Jacquot; D Duval; M Zeniou; C Hauss; B Reinhardt; Y Huss-Garcia; A Dierich; D A Frank; A Hanauer; C Kedinger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Quantitative analysis of the EGF receptor autocrine system reveals cryptic regulation of cell response by ligand capture.

Authors:  A E DeWitt; J Y Dong; H S Wiley; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  12 in total

1.  Microfluidics-integrated time-lapse imaging for analysis of cellular dynamics.

Authors:  Dirk R Albrecht; Gregory H Underhill; Joshua Resnikoff; Avital Mendelson; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Concise review: microfluidic technology platforms: poised to accelerate development and translation of stem cell-derived therapies.

Authors:  Drew M Titmarsh; Huaying Chen; Nick R Glass; Justin J Cooper-White
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Stem cells in microfluidics.

Authors:  Huei-Wen Wu; Chun-Che Lin; Gwo-Bin Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Three-dimensional models for studying development and disease: moving on from organisms to organs-on-a-chip and organoids.

Authors:  E L Jackson; H Lu
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Microfluidic perfusion for regulating diffusible signaling in stem cells.

Authors:  Katarina Blagovic; Lily Y Kim; Joel Voldman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Micro- and nanoengineering for stem cell biology: the promise with a caution.

Authors:  Deok-Ho Kim; David J Beebe; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 7.  Shaping Cell Fate: Influence of Topographical Substratum Properties on Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sarita Kumari; Steven Vermeulen; Ben van der Veer; Aurélie Carlier; Jan de Boer; Deepa Subramanyam
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 8.  Probing cell-cell communication with microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Jarrod B French; Peng Li; Hong Zhao; Chung Yu Chan; James R Fick; Stephen J Benkovic; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Cell surface concentrations and concentration ranges for testing in vitro autocrine loops and small molecules.

Authors:  Nikhil Mittal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microbioreactor arrays for full factorial screening of exogenous and paracrine factors in human embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Drew M Titmarsh; James E Hudson; Alejandro Hidalgo; Andrew G Elefanty; Edouard G Stanley; Ernst J Wolvetang; Justin J Cooper-White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.