David L Mount1, Angela V Ashley, James J Lah, Allan I Levey, Felicia C Goldstein. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section on General Internal Medicine, and the Maya Angelou Center on Health Equity, and Hypertension and Vascular Center Wake Forest University Health Science, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. dmount@wfubmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The effect of the apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele (ApoE epsilon4) on cognitive performance in patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD) has been studied in primarily Caucasian samples. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine whether the presence of ApoE epsilon4 is associated with cognitive performance in African American AD patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective design was used to address the study objective. Data were extracted from the records of 65 African American patients who participated in the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Aging (NIH-NIA) Emory University Alzheimer Disease Center Registry. Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of probable AD, cognitive testing using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological battery, and ApoE genotyping. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the patients were ApoE epsilon4 positive. Multiple regression analyses indicated that ApoE epsilon4 was significantly associated with poorer design copying (CERAD Constructional Praxis subtest), but other significant relationships were not observed between positive epsilon4 status and cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that the ApoE epsilon4 allele is not strongly associated with a particular pattern of cognitive functioning in African Americans once they are diagnosed with AD. However, these findings require replication in a large prospectively recruited and population-based sample of African American AD patients before firm conclusions can be reached.
OBJECTIVE: The effect of the apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele (ApoE epsilon4) on cognitive performance in patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD) has been studied in primarily Caucasian samples. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine whether the presence of ApoE epsilon4 is associated with cognitive performance in African American ADpatients. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective design was used to address the study objective. Data were extracted from the records of 65 African American patients who participated in the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Aging (NIH-NIA) Emory University Alzheimer Disease Center Registry. Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of probable AD, cognitive testing using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological battery, and ApoE genotyping. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the patients were ApoE epsilon4 positive. Multiple regression analyses indicated that ApoE epsilon4 was significantly associated with poorer design copying (CERAD Constructional Praxis subtest), but other significant relationships were not observed between positive epsilon4 status and cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that the ApoE epsilon4 allele is not strongly associated with a particular pattern of cognitive functioning in African Americans once they are diagnosed with AD. However, these findings require replication in a large prospectively recruited and population-based sample of African American ADpatients before firm conclusions can be reached.
Authors: Annelies E van der Vlies; Yolande A L Pijnenburg; Teddy Koene; Martin Klein; Astrid Kok; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2007-06-26 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: S Cosentino; N Scarmeas; E Helzner; M M Glymour; J Brandt; M Albert; D Blacker; Y Stern Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J C Morris; A Heyman; R C Mohs; J P Hughes; G van Belle; G Fillenbaum; E D Mellits; C Clark Journal: Neurology Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Craft; L Teri; S D Edland; W A Kukull; G Schellenberg; W C McCormick; J D Bowen; E B Larson Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Liana G Apostolova; Kristy S Hwang; John P Andrawis; Amity E Green; Sona Babakchanian; Jonathan H Morra; Jeffrey L Cummings; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Paul S Aisen; William J Jagust; Robert A Koeppe; Chester A Mathis; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Kenneth Blum; Rajendra D Badgaiyan; Georgia M Dunston; David Baron; Edward J Modestino; Thomas McLaughlin; Bruce Steinberg; Mark S Gold; Marjorie C Gondré-Lewis Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Lindsey Rubin; Lucy A Ingram; Nicholas V Resciniti; Brianna Ashford-Carroll; Katherine Henrietta Leith; Aubrey Rose; Stephanie Ureña; Quentin McCollum; Daniela B Friedman Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-12-24
Authors: Sharmin Hossain; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; May A Beydoun; Jordan Weiss; Marie F Kuczmarski Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 3.718