Literature DB >> 19667996

The emerging role of computerized tomography in assessing cancer cachexia.

Carla M M Prado1, Laura A Birdsell, Vickie E Baracos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review represents an overview of the potential opportunistic use of computerized tomography (CT) to enhance our understanding of abnormal body composition, specifically lean and adipose tissue changes in cancer cachexia. RECENT
FINDINGS: One of the characteristics of cancer cachexia is the depletion of muscle with or without adipose tissue loss. Therefore, a body composition tool that specifically distinguishes between these tissues is essential in assessing this syndrome. Cancer patients are routinely evaluated by high resolution imaging such as CT for the purpose of diagnosis and follow-up. Recent work exploiting CT images for body composition analysis has revealed the natural history of cancer cachexia, including progressive alterations in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, organs, and tumor mass. CT-based quantification of skeletal muscle has permitted identification of individuals with sarcopenia, and links between sarcopenia and functional status, chemotherapy toxicity, time to tumor progression, and mortality.
SUMMARY: CT images routinely acquired from health records of cancer patients can be used to quantify specific lean and adipose tissues, to interpret body composition in population-based studies, and to evaluate individual patients in a clinical and therapeutic decision-making setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19667996     DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328331124a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 1751-4258            Impact factor:   2.302


  70 in total

1.  Worsening central sarcopenia and increasing intra-abdominal fat correlate with decreased survival in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Barbra S Miller; Kathleen M Ignatoski; Stephanie Daignault; Ceit Lindland; Megan Doherty; Paul G Gauger; Gary D Hammer; Stewart C Wang; Gerard M Doherty
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cachexia in pancreatic cancer: new treatment options and measures of success.

Authors:  Kenneth C H Fearon; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Preoperative computed tomography assessment of skeletal muscle mass is valuable in predicting outcomes following hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J S Coelen; Jimme K Wiggers; Chung Y Nio; Marc G Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  The impact of sarcopenia on survival and complications in surgical oncology: A review of the current literature.

Authors:  Savita Joglekar; Peter N Nau; James J Mezhir
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Change in Skeletal Muscle Following Resection of Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer is Predictive of Poor Survival: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jessica J Hopkins; Rebecca Reif; David Bigam; Vickie E Baracos; Dean T Eurich; Michael M Sawyer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Muscle radiodensity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Carla M Prado; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Erin K Weltzien; Jingjie Xiao; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Proteolysis in illness-associated skeletal muscle atrophy: from pathways to networks.

Authors:  Simon S Wing; Stewart H Lecker; R Thomas Jagoe
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.250

8.  ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease.

Authors:  Mathias Plauth; William Bernal; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Manuela Merli; Lindsay D Plank; Tatjana Schütz; Stephan C Bischoff
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Weight loss versus muscle loss: re-evaluating inclusion criteria for future cancer cachexia interventional trials.

Authors:  Eric J Roeland; Joseph D Ma; Sandahl H Nelson; Tyler Seibert; Sean Heavey; Carolyn Revta; Andrea Gallivan; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Cachexia in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Poorna Anandavadivelan; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.