BACKGROUND: As the number of US burn centers has declined, access to burn care is increasingly limited. Inexperience in burn wound assessment by referring physicians often results in overtriage or undertriage. In an effort to improve access to burn care in our region, we instituted a program of telemedicine evaluation of acute burns. METHODS: We created a telemedicine network linking our burn center to three hospitals located 298 to 350 air miles away. Participants agreed to perform telemedicine consultation for acutely burned patients admitted to their emergency departments. We compared consults and referrals from these facilities during the period July 2005 to August 2007 (TELE) to those during a 2-year period before instituting telemedicine (PRE-TELE). RESULTS: During the TELE period, 80 patients were referred, of whom 70 were seen acutely by telemedicine, compared with 28 PRE-TELE referrals. The groups did not differ in age or burn size. Only 31 patients seen by telemedicine received emergency air transport (44.3%), compared with 100% of PRE-TELE patients (p < 0.05). Nine other TELE patients were transported by family; 30 other patients were treated locally. Ten remaining patients were transported without telemedicine evaluation. TELE patients transported by air had somewhat larger burn sizes (9.0% vs. 6.5% total body surface area; p = NS) and longer length of stay (13.0 days vs. 8.0 days; p = NS) than PRE-TELE patients. Burn size estimates by burn center physicians made either by telemedicine or direct inspection correlated closely but both differed significantly from those of referring physicians. Providers and patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with the telemedicine experience. CONCLUSIONS: Acute evaluation of burn patients can be performed accurately by telemedicine. This can reduce undertriage or overtriage for air transport, improve resource utilization, and both enhance and extend burn center expertise to many rural communities at low cost.
BACKGROUND: As the number of US burn centers has declined, access to burn care is increasingly limited. Inexperience in burn wound assessment by referring physicians often results in overtriage or undertriage. In an effort to improve access to burn care in our region, we instituted a program of telemedicine evaluation of acute burns. METHODS: We created a telemedicine network linking our burn center to three hospitals located 298 to 350 air miles away. Participants agreed to perform telemedicine consultation for acutely burned patients admitted to their emergency departments. We compared consults and referrals from these facilities during the period July 2005 to August 2007 (TELE) to those during a 2-year period before instituting telemedicine (PRE-TELE). RESULTS: During the TELE period, 80 patients were referred, of whom 70 were seen acutely by telemedicine, compared with 28 PRE-TELE referrals. The groups did not differ in age or burn size. Only 31 patients seen by telemedicine received emergency air transport (44.3%), compared with 100% of PRE-TELEpatients (p < 0.05). Nine other TELEpatients were transported by family; 30 other patients were treated locally. Ten remaining patients were transported without telemedicine evaluation. TELEpatients transported by air had somewhat larger burn sizes (9.0% vs. 6.5% total body surface area; p = NS) and longer length of stay (13.0 days vs. 8.0 days; p = NS) than PRE-TELEpatients. Burn size estimates by burn center physicians made either by telemedicine or direct inspection correlated closely but both differed significantly from those of referring physicians. Providers and patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with the telemedicine experience. CONCLUSIONS: Acute evaluation of burn patients can be performed accurately by telemedicine. This can reduce undertriage or overtriage for air transport, improve resource utilization, and both enhance and extend burn center expertise to many rural communities at low cost.
Authors: Gary A Vercruysse; Hasan B Alam; Matthew J Martin; Karen Brasel; Eugene E Moore; Carlos V Brown; Amanda Bettencourt; John Schulz; Tina Palmieri; Linwood Haith; Kenji Inaba Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Julia Driessen; Andro Bonhomme; Woody Chang; David A Nace; Dio Kavalieratos; Subashan Perera; Steven M Handler Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Sarah A Johnson; Junxin Shi; Jonathan I Groner; Rajan K Thakkar; Renata Fabia; Gail E Besner; Huiyun Xiang; Krista K Wheeler Journal: Burns Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Luke Grome; Faryan Jalalabadi; C Michael Fordis; Norman Leslie Sussman; Edward M Reece Journal: Semin Plast Surg Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 2.314