BACKGROUND: Temporary vascular shunting to restore flow after vascular injury has been advocated. The effectiveness of this adjunct in protecting against ischemic injury has not been established. This study will assess the temporal impact of shunts on ischemic injury and arterial flow. METHODS: A porcine model of hind-limb ischemia via iliac artery occlusion was used (N = 36; weight [kg] +/- SD: 89 +/- 4.4). Animals were randomized into one control (Iscctrl) and four study groups (Isc0, Isc1, Isc3, and Isc6) according to ischemic time. Shunt placement followed ischemia, and flow and circulating injury markers were collected incrementally during 18 hours of reperfusion. Flow proportions and a calculated Ischemia Injury Index were used to characterize group differences. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences concerning initial weight, hemodynamic, or laboratory values. Shunt patency was 92% in the absence of anticoagulation. The proportion of common femoral arterial flow to baseline flow in the Isc6 group was lower than the Iscctrl group (p = 0.02). There was a similar trend with the Isc1 and Isc3 groups. The Ischemia Injury Index demonstrated that there was a difference in the Isc3 and Isc6 groups (late shunt placement) compared with the Iscctrl, Isc0, and Isc1 groups (early shunt placement) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides physiologic insight into the benefit of shunts in a model of extremity ischemia. Early shunting protects the extremity from further ischemic insult and reduces circulating markers of tissue injury. Additionally, the presence of a shunt does not increase the Ischemic Injury Index and patency is maintained in the absence of heparinization.
BACKGROUND: Temporary vascular shunting to restore flow after vascular injury has been advocated. The effectiveness of this adjunct in protecting against ischemic injury has not been established. This study will assess the temporal impact of shunts on ischemic injury and arterial flow. METHODS: A porcine model of hind-limb ischemia via iliac artery occlusion was used (N = 36; weight [kg] +/- SD: 89 +/- 4.4). Animals were randomized into one control (Iscctrl) and four study groups (Isc0, Isc1, Isc3, and Isc6) according to ischemic time. Shunt placement followed ischemia, and flow and circulating injury markers were collected incrementally during 18 hours of reperfusion. Flow proportions and a calculated Ischemia Injury Index were used to characterize group differences. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences concerning initial weight, hemodynamic, or laboratory values. Shunt patency was 92% in the absence of anticoagulation. The proportion of common femoral arterial flow to baseline flow in the Isc6 group was lower than the Iscctrl group (p = 0.02). There was a similar trend with the Isc1 and Isc3 groups. The Ischemia Injury Index demonstrated that there was a difference in the Isc3 and Isc6 groups (late shunt placement) compared with the Iscctrl, Isc0, and Isc1 groups (early shunt placement) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides physiologic insight into the benefit of shunts in a model of extremity ischemia. Early shunting protects the extremity from further ischemic insult and reduces circulating markers of tissue injury. Additionally, the presence of a shunt does not increase the Ischemic Injury Index and patency is maintained in the absence of heparinization.
Authors: Oscar J F Van Waes; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Wouter Hogendoorn; Jens A Halm; Jefrey Vermeulen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Jason S Radowsky; Joseph D Caruso; Rajiv Luthra; Matthew J Bradley; Eric A Elster; Jonathan A Forsberg; Nicole J Crane Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240