Alan L Nager1, Kajal Khanna. 1. Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, and The Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA. anager@chla.usc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency Department crowding has long been described. Despite the daily challenges of managing emergency department volume and acuity; a surge response during a disaster entails even greater challenges including collaboration, intervention, and resourcefulness to effectively carry out pediatric disaster management. Understanding surge and how to respond with appropriate planning will lead to success. To achieve this, we sought to analyze models of surge; review regional and national data outlining surge challenges and factors that impact surge; and to outline potential solutions. METHODS: We conducted a systemic review and included articles and documents that best described the theoretical and practical basis of surge response. We organized the systematic review according to the following questions: What are the elements and models that are delineated by the concept of surge? What is the basis for surge response based on regional and national published sources? What are the broad global solutions? What are the major lessons observed that will impact effective surge capacity? RESULTS: Multiple models of surge are described including public health, facility-based and community-based; a 6-tiered response system; and intrinsic or extrinsic surge capacity. In addition, essential components (4 S's of surge response) are described along with regional and national data outlining surge challenges, impacting factors, global solutions, and lesions observed. CONCLUSIONS: There are numerous shortcomings regionally and nationally affecting our ability to provide an effective and coordinated surge response. Planning, education, and training will lead to an effective pediatric disaster management response.
BACKGROUND: Emergency Department crowding has long been described. Despite the daily challenges of managing emergency department volume and acuity; a surge response during a disaster entails even greater challenges including collaboration, intervention, and resourcefulness to effectively carry out pediatric disaster management. Understanding surge and how to respond with appropriate planning will lead to success. To achieve this, we sought to analyze models of surge; review regional and national data outlining surge challenges and factors that impact surge; and to outline potential solutions. METHODS: We conducted a systemic review and included articles and documents that best described the theoretical and practical basis of surge response. We organized the systematic review according to the following questions: What are the elements and models that are delineated by the concept of surge? What is the basis for surge response based on regional and national published sources? What are the broad global solutions? What are the major lessons observed that will impact effective surge capacity? RESULTS: Multiple models of surge are described including public health, facility-based and community-based; a 6-tiered response system; and intrinsic or extrinsic surge capacity. In addition, essential components (4 S's of surge response) are described along with regional and national data outlining surge challenges, impacting factors, global solutions, and lesions observed. CONCLUSIONS: There are numerous shortcomings regionally and nationally affecting our ability to provide an effective and coordinated surge response. Planning, education, and training will lead to an effective pediatric disaster management response.
Authors: Markus Körner; Lucas L Geyer; Stefan Wirth; Claus-Dieter Meisel; Maximilian F Reiser; Ulrich Linsenmaier Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2010-12-01
Authors: David Sugerman; Kelly H Nadeau; Kathryn Lafond; Wendy Cameron; Karl Soetebier; Michael Jhung; Alexander Isakov; Ian Greenwald; Karen Neil; Stephanie Schrag; Alicia Fry Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Anne W Alexandrov; Kisha C Coleman; Paola Palazzo; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 6.570
Authors: Erik R Barthel; James R Pierce; Catherine J Goodhue; Henri R Ford; Tracy C Grikscheit; Jeffrey S Upperman Journal: Theor Biol Med Model Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 2.432