Nancy Blake1, Kathleen Stevenson. 1. PCS Critical Care Services and Education, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In reviewing the literature, there has not been a family reunification plan that has worked consistently during disasters. During Hurricane Katrina, there were children who were sent to a shelter in a different state than their patients. When children are involved, the issues become even more difficult, because some children who are preverbal cannot tell their names or their parents names. Tracking systems have been developed but are not interoperable. No central repository has been developed. There are also issues related to transporting patients, psychosocial issues as well as safety issues that are different when children will be unaccompanied by an adult. METHODS: Two national meetings were held with experts from all over the country who have an expertise in the care of children. Six focused groups were identified: patient movement/transportation; technology/tracking; clinical issues, nonmedical issues; communication/regulatory issues; and pediatric psychosocial support. The second meeting was a consensus conference. RESULTS: Recommendations from each subgroup were presented and voted on. All recommendations were accepted. CONCLUSIONS: The issue of reunification of families in disaster is still a problem. Further work needs to be done on tracking systems that are interoperable before another large disaster strike, pediatric psychological issues after a disaster, transporting patients, and care of the pediatric patient who is not accompanied by an adult. Once a system has been developed, the system needs to be tested by large scale drills that practice moving children across state lines and from one area to another.
BACKGROUND: In reviewing the literature, there has not been a family reunification plan that has worked consistently during disasters. During Hurricane Katrina, there were children who were sent to a shelter in a different state than their patients. When children are involved, the issues become even more difficult, because some children who are preverbal cannot tell their names or their parents names. Tracking systems have been developed but are not interoperable. No central repository has been developed. There are also issues related to transporting patients, psychosocial issues as well as safety issues that are different when children will be unaccompanied by an adult. METHODS: Two national meetings were held with experts from all over the country who have an expertise in the care of children. Six focused groups were identified: patient movement/transportation; technology/tracking; clinical issues, nonmedical issues; communication/regulatory issues; and pediatric psychosocial support. The second meeting was a consensus conference. RESULTS: Recommendations from each subgroup were presented and voted on. All recommendations were accepted. CONCLUSIONS: The issue of reunification of families in disaster is still a problem. Further work needs to be done on tracking systems that are interoperable before another large disaster strike, pediatric psychological issues after a disaster, transporting patients, and care of the pediatric patient who is not accompanied by an adult. Once a system has been developed, the system needs to be tested by large scale drills that practice moving children across state lines and from one area to another.
Authors: Mary A King; Alexander S Niven; William Beninati; Ray Fang; Sharon Einav; Lewis Rubinson; Niranjan Kissoon; Asha V Devereaux; Michael D Christian; Colin K Grissom Journal: Chest Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Mary A King; Molly V Dorfman; Sharon Einav; Alex S Niven; Niranjan Kissoon; Colin K Grissom Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Mary A King; Renee I Matos; Mitchell T Hamele; Matthew A Borgman; Luke A Zabrocki; Samir K Gadepalli; Ryan C Maves Journal: Chest Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 10.262