AIMS: Recently, a mechanical single-sheath technique with a multiple venous entry-site approach for the removal of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads was reported to have a high success rate and few complications. In our institution, this technique of lead removal has been used since 2002. In this paper, we report our experience, with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the proposed procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a retrospective analysis of the case records of all patients referred to our institution for transvenous lead extraction, according to class I or II Heart Rhythm Society indications. Over 7 years, 300 consecutive patients underwent procedures for transvenous removal of 518 leads. The most frequent indication for extraction was infection (74%). Complete removal of 502 (96.9%) leads and partial removal of 10 leads (1.9%) were achieved. Six leads (1.2%) could not be removed. All defibrillation coils and coronary sinus leads were successfully removed. There were no procedure-related deaths but only one major complication (0.3%). CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that the proposed mechanical technique is very effective and associated with few serious complications, thus confirming previous findings. This approach may be reproduced in other settings with very satisfactory results.
AIMS: Recently, a mechanical single-sheath technique with a multiple venous entry-site approach for the removal of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads was reported to have a high success rate and few complications. In our institution, this technique of lead removal has been used since 2002. In this paper, we report our experience, with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the proposed procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a retrospective analysis of the case records of all patients referred to our institution for transvenous lead extraction, according to class I or II Heart Rhythm Society indications. Over 7 years, 300 consecutive patients underwent procedures for transvenous removal of 518 leads. The most frequent indication for extraction was infection (74%). Complete removal of 502 (96.9%) leads and partial removal of 10 leads (1.9%) were achieved. Six leads (1.2%) could not be removed. All defibrillation coils and coronary sinus leads were successfully removed. There were no procedure-related deaths but only one major complication (0.3%). CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that the proposed mechanical technique is very effective and associated with few serious complications, thus confirming previous findings. This approach may be reproduced in other settings with very satisfactory results.
Authors: Michał Chudzik; Andrzej Kutarski; Przemysław Mitkowski; Andrzej Przybylski; Joanna Lewek; Barbara Małecka; Tomasz Smukowski; Aleksander Maciąg; Janusz Smigielski Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Ana Isabel Azevedo; João Primo; Helena Gonçalves; Marco Oliveira; Luís Adão; Elisabeth Santos; José Ribeiro; Marlene Fonseca; Adelaide V Dias; Luís Vouga; Vasco Gama Ribeiro Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-04-13