Literature DB >> 19665700

A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.

Michelle Jarick1, Mike J Dixon, Mark T Stewart, Emily C Maxwell, Daniel Smilek.   

Abstract

Synaesthesia is a fascinating condition whereby individuals report extraordinary experiences when presented with ordinary stimuli. Here we examined an individual (L) who experiences time units (i.e., months of the year and hours of the day) as occupying specific spatial locations (January is 30 degrees to the left of midline). This form of time-space synaesthesia has been recently investigated by Smilek et al. (2007) who demonstrated that synaesthetic time-space associations are highly consistent, occur regardless of intention, and can direct spatial attention. We extended this work by showing that for the synaesthete L, her time-space vantage point changes depending on whether the time units are seen or heard. For example, when L sees the word JANUARY, she reports experiencing January on her left side, however when she hears the word "January" she experiences the month on her right side. L's subjective reports were validated using a spatial cueing paradigm. The names of months were centrally presented followed by targets on the left or right. L was faster at detecting targets in validly cued locations relative to invalidly cued locations both for visually presented cues (January orients attention to the left) and for aurally presented cues (January orients attention to the right). We replicated this difference in visual and aural cueing effects using hour of the day. Our findings support previous research showing that time-space synaesthesia can bias visual spatial attention, and further suggest that for this synaesthete, time-space associations differ depending on whether they are visually or aurally induced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19665700     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  9 in total

1.  Do sequence-space synaesthetes have better spatial imagery skills? Yes, but there are individual differences.

Authors:  Andrew M Havlik; Duncan A Carmichael; Julia Simner
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-05-14

2.  Linguistic asymmetry, egocentric anchoring, and sensory modality as factors for the observed association between time and space perception.

Authors:  Eunice E Hang Choy; Him Cheung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-05-17

3.  Is it for real? Evaluating authenticity of musical pitch-space synesthesia.

Authors:  O Linkovski; L Akiva-Kabiri; L Gertner; A Henik
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

4.  Not all synesthetes are alike: spatial vs. visual dimensions of sequence-space synesthesia.

Authors:  Clare N Jonas; Mark C Price
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-30

5.  Do you see what I hear? Vantage point preference and visual dominance in a time-space synaesthete.

Authors:  Michelle Jarick; Mark T Stewart; Daniel Smilek; Michael J Dixon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16

6.  An extended case study on the phenomenology of sequence-space synesthesia.

Authors:  Cassandra Gould; Tom Froese; Adam B Barrett; Jamie Ward; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Semantic mechanisms may be responsible for developing synesthesia.

Authors:  Aleksandra Mroczko-Wąsowicz; Danko Nikolić
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test of sequence-space synesthesia.

Authors:  Nicolas Rothen; Kristin Jünemann; Andy D Mealor; Vera Burckhardt; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-12

9.  Switching between Multiple Codes of SNARC-Like Associations: Two Conceptual Replication Attempts with Anodal tDCS in Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Design.

Authors:  Philipp A Schroeder; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.