OBJECTIVES: (i) To develop a group-based intervention for the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue incorporating energy effectiveness and cognitive behavioural approaches and (ii) to undertake a process and preliminary evaluation. METHODS: Drawing upon a literature search, a local model of good practice and the views of service users and health professionals, a manualised group-based fatigue management programme was developed, designed to be delivered by health professionals. A process and preliminary outcome evaluation was undertaken. Sixteen participants attended across two iterations. Participant feedback, obtained via a focus group and evaluation questionnaires, was used to refine the programme. Outcomes were collected pre- and post-programme (including fatigue severity, quality of life, self-efficacy). RESULTS: Focus group feedback suggested the programme was well received, reflected in high attendance and positive ratings on evaluation questionnaires. At follow-up, despite the small sample size, there were significant improvements in perceived self-efficacy for managing fatigue. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based fatigue management intervention has been developed and preliminary findings look promising. In the next phase we will examine whether the programme transfers satisfactorily to other centres and collect data in preparation for a randomised controlled trial (RCT). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Implications for practice will emerge when the results of our RCT are published. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: (i) To develop a group-based intervention for the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue incorporating energy effectiveness and cognitive behavioural approaches and (ii) to undertake a process and preliminary evaluation. METHODS: Drawing upon a literature search, a local model of good practice and the views of service users and health professionals, a manualised group-based fatigue management programme was developed, designed to be delivered by health professionals. A process and preliminary outcome evaluation was undertaken. Sixteen participants attended across two iterations. Participant feedback, obtained via a focus group and evaluation questionnaires, was used to refine the programme. Outcomes were collected pre- and post-programme (including fatigue severity, quality of life, self-efficacy). RESULTS: Focus group feedback suggested the programme was well received, reflected in high attendance and positive ratings on evaluation questionnaires. At follow-up, despite the small sample size, there were significant improvements in perceived self-efficacy for managing fatigue. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based fatigue management intervention has been developed and preliminary findings look promising. In the next phase we will examine whether the programme transfers satisfactorily to other centres and collect data in preparation for a randomised controlled trial (RCT). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Implications for practice will emerge when the results of our RCT are published. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Peter W Thomas; Sarah Thomas; Paula Kersten; Rosemary Jones; Alison Nock; Vicky Slingsby; Colin Green; Roger Baker; Kate Galvin; Charles Hillier Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Maria Janina Wendebourg; Lena Katharina Feddersen; Stephanie Lau; Sascha Köpke; Rona Moss-Morris; Christoph Heesen; Jana Pöttgen Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2016 May-Jun
Authors: S Thomas; P Kersten; P W Thomas; V Slingsby; A Nock; R Jones; A Davies Smith; K T Galvin; R Baker; C Hillier Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Simiao Wu; Trudie Chalder; Kirstin E Anderson; David Gillespie; Malcolm R Macleod; Gillian E Mead Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kirsten Van Kessel; Duncan R Babbage; Nicholas Reay; Warren M Miner-Williams; Paula Kersten Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Sarah Thomas; Peter W Thomas; Paula Kersten; Rosemary Jones; Colin Green; Alison Nock; Vicky Slingsby; Angela Davies Smith; Roger Baker; Kathleen T Galvin; Charles Hillier Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Peter W Thomas; Sarah Thomas; Paula Kersten; Rosemary Jones; Vicky Slingsby; Alison Nock; Angela Davies Smith; Roger Baker; Kathleen T Galvin; Charles Hillier Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 2.474