BACKGROUND/AIMS: Efficacy of retreatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin of non-responders to standard or pegylated IFN plus ribavirin has been assessed in various studies, but sustained virologic response (SVR) rates are variable and factors influencing efficacy and tolerability still remain incompletely defined. We aimed to focus on SVR rates and to identify factors influencing them in this meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE as well as a manual search were used. Studies were included if they were controlled or uncontrolled trials, if they had been published as full-length papers and if they included non-responders to standard or pegylated IFN and ribavirin therapy. Fourteen trials were included in the meta-analysis. Data on study populations, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from trials using a random-effects model. Primary outcome was the SVR rate. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of SVR rate was 16.3% (95% Confidence Interval - 95% CI, 8.3-29.6%). There was a significant heterogeneity among studies (p<0.0001). Heterogeneity was less apparent in studies that included fewer patients with cirrhosis or overweight. By meta-regression, higher SVR rate was observed in trials with a lower prevalence of subjects with genotype 1 infection and with fewer overweight patients. The use of a 24-week retreatment stopping rule did not affect SVR rate. CONCLUSIONS: The overall modest efficacy argues against an indiscriminate retreatment with PEG-IFN and ribavirin of all non-responders. Restricting retreatment to non-overweight patients or to those with genotype 2 or 3 infection, using a 24-week retreatment stopping rule, would optimize the potential benefit with a scarce likelihood of missing a curative response.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Efficacy of retreatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin of non-responders to standard or pegylated IFN plus ribavirin has been assessed in various studies, but sustained virologic response (SVR) rates are variable and factors influencing efficacy and tolerability still remain incompletely defined. We aimed to focus on SVR rates and to identify factors influencing them in this meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE as well as a manual search were used. Studies were included if they were controlled or uncontrolled trials, if they had been published as full-length papers and if they included non-responders to standard or pegylated IFN and ribavirin therapy. Fourteen trials were included in the meta-analysis. Data on study populations, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from trials using a random-effects model. Primary outcome was the SVR rate. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of SVR rate was 16.3% (95% Confidence Interval - 95% CI, 8.3-29.6%). There was a significant heterogeneity among studies (p<0.0001). Heterogeneity was less apparent in studies that included fewer patients with cirrhosis or overweight. By meta-regression, higher SVR rate was observed in trials with a lower prevalence of subjects with genotype 1 infection and with fewer overweight patients. The use of a 24-week retreatment stopping rule did not affect SVR rate. CONCLUSIONS: The overall modest efficacy argues against an indiscriminate retreatment with PEG-IFN and ribavirin of all non-responders. Restricting retreatment to non-overweight patients or to those with genotype 2 or 3 infection, using a 24-week retreatment stopping rule, would optimize the potential benefit with a scarce likelihood of missing a curative response.
Authors: Jordan J Feld; Apurva A Modi; Ramy El-Diwany; Yaron Rotman; Emmanuel Thomas; Golo Ahlenstiel; Rachel Titerence; Christopher Koh; Vera Cherepanov; Theo Heller; Marc G Ghany; Yoon Park; Jay H Hoofnagle; T Jake Liang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Jagpreet Chhatwal; Shannon A Ferrante; Cliff Brass; Antoine C El Khoury; Margaret Burroughs; Bruce Bacon; Rafael Esteban-Mur; Elamin H Elbasha Journal: Value Health Date: 2013 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Joseph S Doyle; Esther Aspinall; Danny Liew; Alexander J Thompson; Margaret E Hellard Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anita J Brogan; Sandra E Talbird; James R Thompson; Jeffrey D Miller; Jaime Rubin; Baris Deniz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna Licata; Maria Giovanna Minissale; Lydia Giannitrapani; Filippo A Montalto; Clelia Lombardo; Luigi Mirarchi; Simona Amodeo; Maurizio Soresi; Giuseppe Montalto Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 3.397