Literature DB >> 19664960

Trends in prenatal sonography use and subsequent urologic diagnoses and abortions in the United States.

Michael H Hsieh1, Julie Lai, Christopher S Saigal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prenatal sonography has enabled fetal diagnosis of urologic conditions and is now commonly used in the US. The impact of this technology on the incidence of pediatric urological diagnoses is unknown. We sought to assess trends in prenatal sonography and resulting urologic diagnoses and/or abortions.
METHODS: Using administrative codes in Ingenix, a claims database of individuals with employer-based insurance, we identified women undergoing prenatal ultrasounds (1998-2005). These were linked to claims for subsequent abortions, live births, and postnatal urologic diagnoses in resulting offspring.
RESULTS: 99.07% of women underwent ultrasound and childbirth. Ultrasound use among women whose pregnancies proceeded to birth increased from 90,568 to 96,866 per 100,000 mother-infant pairs from 1998 to 2005. Of women who did or did not undergo ultrasounds, 1.25% and 0.66% had infants with urologic diagnoses, respectively. The rates of prenatal ultrasound-detected urinary tract anomalies increased from 1032.26 per 100,000 live births in 1999 to 1225.71 per 100,000 live births in 2005.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal ultrasound is widely used, but increased utilization of this diagnostic modality did not seem to be associated with abortions. The rate of pediatric urologic diagnoses in infants who had received prenatal ultrasound did not rise significantly over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19664960      PMCID: PMC3271705          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  8 in total

Review 1.  Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. European Concerted Action: DADA (Decision-making After the Diagnosis of a fetal Abnormality).

Authors:  C Mansfield; S Hopfer; T M Marteau
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Estimated pregnancy rates by outcome for the United States, 1990-2004.

Authors:  Stephanie J Ventura; Joyce C Abma; William D Mosher; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2008-04-14

3.  Impact of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination on the prevalence of selected birth defects in Hawaii.

Authors:  M B Forrester; R D Merz; P W Yoon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  The role of obstetrical medical technology in preventing low birth weight.

Authors:  H A Ricciotti; K T Chen; B P Sachs
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995

5.  Diagnosis and outcome of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction in the northern region of England.

Authors:  Dilly O Anumba; John E Scott; Nick D Plant; Stephen C Robson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Implications of prenatal ultrasound screening in the incidence of major genitourinary malformations.

Authors:  W J Cromie; K Lee; K Houde; L Holmes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Structural genitourinary defects detected in utero.

Authors:  J Mandell; B R Blyth; C A Peters; A B Retik; J A Estroff; B R Benacerraf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Fetal hydronephrosis; prevalence, natural history and postnatal consequences in an unselected population.

Authors:  Sverker Ek; Karl-Johan Lidefeldt; Lena Varricio
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.636

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current State of Fetal Intervention for Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction.

Authors:  Douglass B Clayton; John W Brock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Severe congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: epidemiology can inform ethical decision-making.

Authors:  P Danziger; D R Berman; K Luckritz; K Arbour; N Laventhal
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.521

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.