BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is managed mainly by general practitioners. The blood pressure level of most patients treated in a general practice setting is greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg. AIMS: To understand why a blood pressure level greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg does not lead to a change of treatment. METHODS: Over a 2-week period, 479 hypertensive patients were included in a cross-sectional study by 27 general practitioners. Consultation data were collected, as were reasons why patients with a blood pressure level greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg did not have their treatment changed. RESULTS: Blood pressure level was greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg in 58% of patients; treatment was changed in 15% of these individuals. The lack of change in treatment was justified by the physicians as follows: the blood pressure measurements were not considered to be representative (about 30% of cases); the therapeutic result was considered to be satisfactory in the circumstances (about 30% of cases); change was not appropriate given the patient's specific context (the remaining third of cases). The proportion of uncontrolled hypertensive patients whose treatment remained the same was significantly higher among patients with a disease that affected their lifestyle or threatened their life expectancy. CONCLUSION: The disappointing therapeutic results observed in the management of arterial hypertension do not arise only from poor application of guidelines by general practitioners. Reluctance to rely on blood pressure measurements, a perception that guidelines are revised frequently and are not always clear, and consideration of the general practitioner's activity in the patient's specific context are the main factors involved.
BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is managed mainly by general practitioners. The blood pressure level of most patients treated in a general practice setting is greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg. AIMS: To understand why a blood pressure level greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg does not lead to a change of treatment. METHODS: Over a 2-week period, 479 hypertensivepatients were included in a cross-sectional study by 27 general practitioners. Consultation data were collected, as were reasons why patients with a blood pressure level greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg did not have their treatment changed. RESULTS: Blood pressure level was greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg in 58% of patients; treatment was changed in 15% of these individuals. The lack of change in treatment was justified by the physicians as follows: the blood pressure measurements were not considered to be representative (about 30% of cases); the therapeutic result was considered to be satisfactory in the circumstances (about 30% of cases); change was not appropriate given the patient's specific context (the remaining third of cases). The proportion of uncontrolled hypertensivepatients whose treatment remained the same was significantly higher among patients with a disease that affected their lifestyle or threatened their life expectancy. CONCLUSION: The disappointing therapeutic results observed in the management of arterial hypertension do not arise only from poor application of guidelines by general practitioners. Reluctance to rely on blood pressure measurements, a perception that guidelines are revised frequently and are not always clear, and consideration of the general practitioner's activity in the patient's specific context are the main factors involved.
Authors: Christianne L Roumie; Susan Ofner; Joseph S Ross; Greg Arling; Linda S Williams; Diana L Ordin; Dawn M Bravata Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-06-21
Authors: Matthew R Weir; Willa A Hsueh; Shawna D Nesbitt; Thomas J Littlejohn; Alan Graff; Ali Shojaee; William F Waverczak; Chunlin Qian; Christopher J Jones; Joel M Neutel Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2011-02-05 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Lena Barrera; Craig Leaper; Utz J Pape; Azeem Majeed; Marta Blangiardo; Christopher Millett Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 2.655