PURPOSE: In the first part of this study, we analyzed a subset of patients to determine what factors may have been present in those with poor outcomes after SLAP repair. In part 2, we evaluated clinical outcomes of these patients after further treatment. METHODS: We completed a retrospective medical record review of consecutive patients presenting between 2000 and 2007 with pain, stiffness, and/or mechanical symptoms after a SLAP repair. To evaluate for similarities among this cohort, data collection included demographics, age at initial SLAP repair, history of trauma, medical history, nonoperative and operative treatments, and physical examination. Outcome measures included patient satisfaction and the Simple Shoulder Test questionnaire. Subsequent treatment was then reviewed, investigating whether patients received physical therapy, cortisone injection, and/or revision surgery in an attempt to improve satisfaction. Outcome measures again included patient satisfaction and the Simple Shoulder Test questionnaire. RESULTS: We found 40 shoulders in 39 patients who met inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of initial SLAP repair was 43 years. Of the patients, 30 (75%) presented with pain and decreased range of motion, 9 (22.5%) presented with pain but full range of motion, and 1 (2.5%) presented with pain and mechanical symptoms but full range of motion. The mean Simple Shoulder Test score upon presentation after SLAP repair was 3.04 out of 12 (SD, 2.18; range, 0 to 7). We included 34 shoulders in the analysis of treatment outcome. Of these, 29% (10 of 34) were satisfied after conservative treatment, 62% (13 of 21) were satisfied after revision surgery, and 68% (23 of 34) were satisfied overall after either type of further treatment. The mean Simple Shoulder Test score after further treatment was 8.73 out of 12 (SD, 3.45; range, 0 to 12). CONCLUSIONS: In this study 71% of patients (mean patient age, 43 years) with a poor outcome after SLAP repair were dissatisfied with conservative treatment. Therefore, once a patient has a poor outcome after SLAP repair, there is a high chance of conservative treatment failing. Although patients have better outcomes with operative intervention, 32% will continue to have a suboptimal result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
PURPOSE: In the first part of this study, we analyzed a subset of patients to determine what factors may have been present in those with poor outcomes after SLAP repair. In part 2, we evaluated clinical outcomes of these patients after further treatment. METHODS: We completed a retrospective medical record review of consecutive patients presenting between 2000 and 2007 with pain, stiffness, and/or mechanical symptoms after a SLAP repair. To evaluate for similarities among this cohort, data collection included demographics, age at initial SLAP repair, history of trauma, medical history, nonoperative and operative treatments, and physical examination. Outcome measures included patient satisfaction and the Simple Shoulder Test questionnaire. Subsequent treatment was then reviewed, investigating whether patients received physical therapy, cortisone injection, and/or revision surgery in an attempt to improve satisfaction. Outcome measures again included patient satisfaction and the Simple Shoulder Test questionnaire. RESULTS: We found 40 shoulders in 39 patients who met inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of initial SLAP repair was 43 years. Of the patients, 30 (75%) presented with pain and decreased range of motion, 9 (22.5%) presented with pain but full range of motion, and 1 (2.5%) presented with pain and mechanical symptoms but full range of motion. The mean Simple Shoulder Test score upon presentation after SLAP repair was 3.04 out of 12 (SD, 2.18; range, 0 to 7). We included 34 shoulders in the analysis of treatment outcome. Of these, 29% (10 of 34) were satisfied after conservative treatment, 62% (13 of 21) were satisfied after revision surgery, and 68% (23 of 34) were satisfied overall after either type of further treatment. The mean Simple Shoulder Test score after further treatment was 8.73 out of 12 (SD, 3.45; range, 0 to 12). CONCLUSIONS: In this study 71% of patients (mean patient age, 43 years) with a poor outcome after SLAP repair were dissatisfied with conservative treatment. Therefore, once a patient has a poor outcome after SLAP repair, there is a high chance of conservative treatment failing. Although patients have better outcomes with operative intervention, 32% will continue to have a suboptimal result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Authors: Lori A Michener; Jeffrey S Abrams; Kellie C Huxel Bliven; Sue Falsone; Kevin G Laudner; Edward G McFarland; James E Tibone; Charles A Thigpen; Timothy L Uhl Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Ian S Hong; Joshua D Meade; Bradley L Young; Ziqing Yu; David P Trofa; James E Fleischli; Nady Hamid; Dana Piasecki; Bryan M Saltzman Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-07-21
Authors: Baris Kocaoglu; Tekin Kerem Ulku; Safiye Sayilir; Mehmet Ugur Ozbaydar; Alp Bayramoglu; Mustafa Karahan Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Alexander Kreines; Manuel Pontes; Elizabeth Ford; Kristen Herbst; Jeffrey Murray; Brian Busconi; Sean McMillan Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2020-03
Authors: Rachel M Frank; Shane J Nho; Kevin C McGill; Robert C Grumet; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo Journal: Adv Orthop Date: 2013-03-25
Authors: Fabiano Rebouças; Bruno Cesar Pereira; Ricardo Dantas Rocha; Cantídio Salvador Filardi; Miguel Pereira da Costa; Romulo Brasil Filho; Antonio Carlos Tenor Junior Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2015-06-12