Literature DB >> 19664456

Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: a cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies.

Deborah A Boehm-Davis1, Roger Remington.   

Abstract

Interruptions are ubiquitous, and they can lead to disastrous consequences. The goal of this paper is to describe remedies that have been proposed to reduce the disruption caused by interruptions based on an understanding of how principles of human cognitive processing bear on the sequence of events that take place during an interruption. We show that interruptions tap disparate cognitive operations, from attention to decision making to memory. We illustrate how these cognitive processes can lead to interruption-induced errors, and how they can help in understanding potential problems with remedies that have been proposed to ameliorate those effects. We present a framework in which the load imposed by the task and the cost of an error suggests the types of solutions that should be considered for a given domain. We then discuss the implications of this approach for understanding and reducing the negative effect of interruptions in transportation domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19664456     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  8 in total

1.  Interruptions to clinical work: how frequent is too frequent?

Authors:  Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-06

2.  Pain-Contingent Interruption and Resumption of Work Goals: A Within-Day Diary Analysis.

Authors:  Morris Okun; Paul Karoly; Chung Jung Mun; Hanjoe Kim
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Nurses' work with interruptions: an objective model for testing interventions.

Authors:  Robert A Myers; Pratik J Parikh
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-09-04

4.  Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Camilla Göras; Karolina Olin; Maria Unbeck; Karin Pukk-Härenstam; Anna Ehrenberg; Mesfin Kassaye Tessma; Ulrica Nilsson; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  An observational study of distractions in the operating theatre.

Authors:  A van Harten; H G Gooszen; J J Koksma; T J H Niessen; T A Abma
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Failure to demonstrate effects of interruptions on diagnostic reasoning: three experiments.

Authors:  Mai Alajaji; Nada Saleh; Ali Hassan AlKhulaif; Silvia Mamede; Jerome I Rotgans; Hatouf Sukkarieh; Nouf AlHarbi; Mohi Eldin Magzoub; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  When the phone rings - factors influencing its impact on the experience of patients and healthcare workers during primary care consultation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Y L Koong; D Koot; S K Eng; A Purani; A Yusoff; C C Goh; S S H Teo; N C Tan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 8.  Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Magdalena Z Raban; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.035

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.