Quintin Pan1, Michael A Gorin, Theodoros N Teknos. 1. The Ohio State University Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 456 West Tenth Avenue, Cramblett Medical Clinic, Suite 4A, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Quintin.Pan@osumc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a challenging problem and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Historically, locally advanced HNSCC has been primarily managed with surgery and radiation (RT). The integration of pharmacotherapy has rapidly expanded over the years into the multimodality treatment paradigm of locally advanced HNSCC. OBJECTIVE: The studies leading to the adoption of the current standard of care for locally advanced HNSCC are discussed. In addition, the limitations of these various treatment approaches are presented. METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database for studies published before January 2009. The keywords used for this search were: head and neck neoplasms, chemoradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy, EGFR inhibitor, cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab. Publications of randomized clinical trials and other supporting references leading to the current standard of care were particularly selected and discussed in this review. CONCLUSIONS: Various single-agent and multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimens have been examined in the context of randomized clinical trials in locally advanced HNSCC for definitive, induction and adjuvant settings. Results from these clinical trials support the use of cisplatin-based chemoradiation as the standard of care for the definitive and adjuvant settings. Recent evidence indicates that cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, is highly active as a single agent and in combination with standard chemotherapy and/or RT. Future studies should focus to determine the optimal pharmacotherapeutic regimens for use in locally advanced HNSCC.
BACKGROUND: The clinical management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a challenging problem and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Historically, locally advanced HNSCC has been primarily managed with surgery and radiation (RT). The integration of pharmacotherapy has rapidly expanded over the years into the multimodality treatment paradigm of locally advanced HNSCC. OBJECTIVE: The studies leading to the adoption of the current standard of care for locally advanced HNSCC are discussed. In addition, the limitations of these various treatment approaches are presented. METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database for studies published before January 2009. The keywords used for this search were: head and neck neoplasms, chemoradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy, EGFR inhibitor, cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab. Publications of randomized clinical trials and other supporting references leading to the current standard of care were particularly selected and discussed in this review. CONCLUSIONS: Various single-agent and multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimens have been examined in the context of randomized clinical trials in locally advanced HNSCC for definitive, induction and adjuvant settings. Results from these clinical trials support the use of cisplatin-based chemoradiation as the standard of care for the definitive and adjuvant settings. Recent evidence indicates that cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, is highly active as a single agent and in combination with standard chemotherapy and/or RT. Future studies should focus to determine the optimal pharmacotherapeutic regimens for use in locally advanced HNSCC.
Authors: Emilia Albesiano; Meghan Davis; Alfred P See; James E Han; Michael Lim; Drew M Pardoll; Young Kim Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Devraj Basu; Kathleen T Montone; Li-Ping Wang; Phyllis A Gimotty; Rachel Hammond; J Alan Diehl; Anil K Rustgi; John T Lee; Kati Rasanen; Gregory S Weinstein; Meenhard Herlyn Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Inge R H M Konings; Stefan Sleijfer; Ron H J Mathijssen; Peter de Bruijn; Inge M Ghobadi Moghaddam-Helmantel; Linda M van Dam; Erik A C Wiemer; Jaap Verweij; Walter J Loos Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Eva M Galan-Moya; Miguel A de la Cruz-Morcillo; Maria Llanos Valero; Juan L Callejas-Valera; Pedro Melgar-Rojas; Javier Hernadez Losa; Mayte Salcedo; Antonio Fernández-Aramburo; Santiago Ramon y Cajal; Ricardo Sánchez-Prieto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Lisa F Licitra; Robert I Haddad; Makoto Tahara; Ezra Ew Cohen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 4.430