Literature DB >> 19662745

Complications of treatment of musculoskeletal injuries by bone setters.

A Dada1, S O Giwa, W Yinusa, M Ugbeye, S Gbadegesin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional bone setters (TBS) have existed for decades in Nigeria and other countries. Their treatment methods often lead to several complications, the most dangerous being extremity gangrene which usually leads to proximal amputation.
OBJECTIVE: To apprise the Orthodox Practitioners of complications of musculoskeletal injuries treated by the bone setters, the factors that encourage patronage of TBS services and the outcome of the treatment of these complications by the orthodox practitioners.
METHODS: This was a one-year prospective study involving one hundred and twenty-one consecutive patients presenting with complications related to treatment of their musculoskeletal injuries by bone setters. The following data were obtained using observer-administered questionnaires viz; demography, details of initial injury, reasons for patronage of TBS, nature of treatment, estimated cost of treatment and disability of patients at presentation. The outcome of orthodox treatment of these complications was assessed at six months using the following parameters --wound healing, bone union and use of prosthesis by the patients.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients with 155 musculoskeletal injuries and 168 complications of treatment by the TBS were seen 75 (57%) were male and 52 (43%) were female. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 weeks--72 years (mean 29.49 years). The common complications of TBS treatment were malunion and non-union which each accounted for 27 (16.1%) cases. The major reasons for TBS patronage was the perceived low cost of treatment in 47 (27.9%) and pressure from family and friends in 36 (25%) patients. The cost of treatment of the TBS ranged from USD 18-380, whereas, at the Orthopaedic Hospital, it ranged from USD 34-98. At six months after orthodox surgery, 10 (91%) of the patients who had amputation were yet to start using prosthesis, 3 (23%) who had internal fixation failed to unite.
CONCLUSION: The commonest reason for patronage was the believed cheapness of the TBS services. However, this study showed that orthodox treatment is actually cheaper in most cases. Despite all the complications associated with their treatment, majority of the people still have a strong belief in their capability. A suggested solution will be the incorporation of the TBS into the healthcare system so that they could be better trained and controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19662745     DOI: 10.4314/wajm.v28i1.48426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West Afr J Med        ISSN: 0189-160X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Review of the practice of traditional bone setting in Nigeria.

Authors:  A A Dada; W Yinusa; S O Giwa
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  The history of orthopaedic surgery in India: from antiquity to present.

Authors:  Austin C Kaidi; Justin E Hellwinkel; Melvin P Rosenwasser; William M Ricci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Patronage of traditional bonesetters in Makurdi, north-central Nigeria.

Authors:  Ndubuisi Oc Onyemaechi; Omolade A Lasebikan; Itodo C Elachi; Sunday O Popoola; Kehinde S Oluwadiya
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Determinants of utilization of traditional bone setters in Ilorin, north central Nigeria.

Authors:  S A Aderibigbe; S R Agaja; J O Bamidele
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2013-03

Review 5.  Economic Analysis of Children's Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

Authors:  Anthony T Saxton; Dan Poenaru; Doruk Ozgediz; Emmanuel A Ameh; Diana Farmer; Emily R Smith; Henry E Rice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reasons for Patronage of Traditional Bone Setters.

Authors:  Innocent Egbeji Abang; Joseph Asuquo; N E Ngim; Ikpeme Asanye Ikpeme; P Agweye; S E Urom; C Anisi; E Mpama
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

7.  Perspectives in musculoskeletal injury management by traditional bone setters in Ashanti, Ghana.

Authors:  Anthony K Edusei; Frances E Owusu-Ansah; Joslin A Dogbe; Julia Morgan; Kofi Sarpong
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-07-16

8.  Factors affecting utilization of traditional bonesetters in the Northern Region of Ghana.

Authors:  Tolgou Yempabe; Anthony Edusei; Peter Donkor; Alexis Buunaaim; Charles Mock
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-09-30

Review 9.  Snakebite: When the Human Touch Becomes a Bad Touch.

Authors:  Bryan G Fry
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Can traditional bonesetters become trained technicians? Feasibility study among a cohort of Nigerian traditional bonesetters.

Authors:  Ndubuisi Onu Onyemaechi; Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi; Paulinus Okechukwu Ossai; Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-03-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.