| Literature DB >> 19662199 |
Kate W Jordan1, Wenlei He, Elkan F Halpern, Chin-Lee Wu, Leo L Cheng.
Abstract
Accurate interpretation and correlation of tissue spectroscopy with pathological conditions requires disease-specific tissue metabolite databases; however, specimens for research are often kept in frozen storage for various lengths of time. Whether such frozen storage results in alterations to the measured metabolites is a critical but largely unknown issue. In this study, human prostate tissues from specimens that had been stored at -80 degrees C for 32 months were analyzed with high resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy, and compared with the initial measurements of the adjacent specimens from the same cases when snap frozen in the operation room and kept frozen for less than 24 hours. Results of the current study indicate that that the storage-induced metabolite alterations are below the limits that tissue MR spectroscopy can discriminate. Furthermore, quantitative pathology evaluations suggest the observed alterations in metabolite profiles measured from the adjacent specimens of the same prostates may be accounted for by tissue pathological heterogeneities and are not a result of storage conditions. Hence, these results indicate that long-term frozen storage of prostate specimens can be quantitatively analyzed by HRMAS MR spectroscopy without concerns regarding significant metabolic degradation or alteration.Entities:
Keywords: High resolution magic angle spinning; human prostate; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; metabolites; tissue frozen storage
Year: 2007 PMID: 19662199 PMCID: PMC2717844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Insights ISSN: 1177-2719
Figure 1Visually undifferentiated human prostate tissue HRMAS proton spectra from two cuts of the same surgical specimen of a cancerous prostate measured (a) in 2005 after being stored at −80 °C for 32 months, and (b) in 2002 when the sample was thawed after being frozen overnight. Quantitative pathology detected no histopathologically identifiable cancerous glands in either sample; other than stromal cells, the majority of prostate pathology in both samples was histopathologically benign epithelia, which comprised 46.1 and 33.8%, for (a) and (b), respectively. Figure 1 (b) was adopted from Figure 1 (b) of Ref. (Wu et al. 2003). Metabolite intensities analyzed in the current study are labeled with horizontal bars under spectrum 1a.
Quantitative pathology results of prostate sample pairs measured in 2002 and 2005. No histopahtologically identifiable cancer glands were detected in these samples, and the major pathological components were histologically benign epithelia and stroma. The quantitative results are presented as the percentage of benign epithelia as Epith. 2002 (% Vol) and Epith. 2005 (%Vol), respectively. Diff. Epith. %: the absolute values of the epithelial difference between each sample pair. The relative difference is presented as the ratio of the absolute difference over the sum of epithelial percentages for each pair; (a) two values indicate specimens were analyzed twice in 2005; (b) Bold identifies samples with values <20% of relative epithelial differences.
| Specimen No. | Epith. 2002 (% Vol) | Epith. 2005 (% Vol) | Diff. Epith. % | |Epith. 2002 − Epith. 2005| (Epith. 2002 + Epith. 2005)% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.01 | 46.98, 11.69a | 42.97, 7.68 | 84.27, 48.92 |
| 2 | 3.49 | 32.60, 23.28 | 29.11, 19.79 | 80.66, 73.93 |
| 3 | 3.84 | 14.88 | 11.04 | 58.97 |
| 4 | 26.64 | 24.61 | 2.03 | 3.96b |
| 5 | 38.31 | 40.00 | 1.69 | 2.16 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 16.11, 4.74 | 16.11, 4.74 | 100.00, 100.00 |
| 7 | 27.76 | 33.12 | 5.36 | 8.80 |
| 8 | 23.67 | 18.89, 18.30 | 4.78, 5.37 | 11.23, 12.79 |
| 9 | 8.69 | 8.49 | 0.20 | 1.164 |
| 10 | 33.75 | 46.09 | 12.34 | 15.46 |
| 11 | 10.00 | 41.19 | 31.19 | 60.93 |
The p-values of paired t-tests for the 13 most intense resonance peaks measured from the HRMAS spectra. Based on the principle of Bonferroni correction to account for the possible existence of type I error, a p-value of <0.0038 represents statistical significance.
| AllSamples (n = 15) | |Epith. 2002 − Epith. 2005| (Epith. 2002 + Epith. 2005) <20% (n = 7) | |
|---|---|---|
| Lac(4.10–4.14) | 0.0092 | 0.1661 |
| MI(4.05) | 0.5567 | 0.3429 |
| 3.29 | 0.0234 | 0.0690 |
| 3.27 | 0.8176 | 0.2990 |
| 3.25–3.26 | 0.1066 | 0.6920 |
| Pch(3.22) | 0.2646 | 0.8499 |
| Chol(3.20) | 0.0560 | 0.2975 |
| Spm(3.05–3.14) | 0.2023 | 0.1431 |
| Cr(3.03) | 0.0027 | 0.0120 |
| Cit(2.70–2.73) | 0.0042 | 0.0734 |
| Acet(1.92) | 0.0724 | 0.2857 |
| Ala(1.47–1.49) | 0.6829 | 0.5520 |
| Lac(1.32–1.34) | 0.3878 | 0.8709 |
| Mean | 0.2451 | 0.3580 |
| Standard Dev | 0.2807 | 0.2936 |
Figure 2A linear correlation between metabolite intensities (normalized by total spectral intensity excluding tissue water signals) measured in 2002 with those measured in 2005 for seven pairs of tissue samples; within each pair the changes in volume percentages of histological features are <20%.
The concentrations of 21 prostate metabolites for seven sample pairs with relative differences of epithelial volume percentages less than 20% within each pair. Metabolite concentrations (means and standard deviations) obtained in 2002 are compared with those measured in 2005 together with their respective p-values (without Bonferroni corrections) of paired t-tests. Also included in this table are the power calculations to determine the levels of Type II errors for each measured metabolite. These calculations are based on the standard deviations measured with the seven-pairs of samples, using two-sided evaluation of a 5% significant level, and at an 80% power level to determine the minimal detectable differences in metabolite concentrations for each metabolites and presented in the table as the percentage of the 2002 values. These 21 metabolites included all the reported metabolites in Ref. (Wu et al. 2003).
| 2005 | 2002 | Paired t-Test | Detectable Diff (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Lac(4.10–4.14)a | 14.29 | 3.98 | 12.87 | 6.68 | 0.38 | 38.9 |
| MI(4.05) | 10.30 | 2.77 | 12.57 | 5.39 | 0.31 | 54.4 |
| 3.60–3.63b | 16.98 | 6.78 | 20.17 | 13.57 | 0.56 | 78.8 |
| 3.34 | 5.18 | 2.08 | 5.49 | 1.95 | 0.82 | 61.9 |
| 3.29 | 1.11 | 0.63 | 2.53 | 2.13 | 0.13 | 108 |
| 3.27 | 8.79 | 2.38 | 11.17 | 5.60 | 0.30 | 62.8 |
| 3.25–3.26 | 12.22 | 3.32 | 13.95 | 5.85 | 0.26 | 33.8 |
| Pch(3.22) | 1.05 | 0.28 | 1.44 | 1.05 | 0.38 | 95.1 |
| Chol(3.20) | 1.53 | 0.22 | 1.70 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 67.1 |
| Spm(3.05–3.14) | 1.75 | 2.69 | 2.21 | 1.72 | 0.52 | 103 |
| Cr(3.03) | 2.66 | 0.92 | 5.19 | 3.69 | 0.08 | 76.3 |
| Cit(2.70–2.73) | 4.87 | 1.86 | 3.44 | 1.66 | 0.19 | 94.4 |
| 2.31–2.37 | 5.60 | 2.13 | 10.17 | 3.32 | 0.06 | 48.1 |
| 2.01–2.14 | 29.67 | 14.92 | 42.51 | 6.99 | 0.13 | 47.3 |
| Acet(1.92) | 1.36 | 3.02 | 1.19 | 2.54 | 0.44 | 58.8 |
| 1.68–1.78 | 10.89 | 7.11 | 10.98 | 7.34 | 0.98 | 124 |
| Ala(1.47–1.49) | 1.00 | 0.42 | 1.52 | 1.13 | 0.18 | 75.7 |
| Lac(1.32–1.34) | 17.45 | 4.18 | 20.53 | 9.80 | 0.37 | 51.6 |
| 1.19–1.20 | 2.70 | 2.30 | 2.13 | 2.67 | 0.35 | 91.1 |
| 1.04–1.05 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 1.59 | 2.21 | 0.25 | 183 |
| Lipid(0.90)c | 22.87 | 5.11 | 14.65 | 6.55 | 0.03 | 84.6 |
Figure 3Intact prostate tissue HRMAS spectra measured at 4°C at 0 and 12 hours. *denotes an external rubber standard; **indicates alcohol contaminations. Comparison between these two spectra reveals metabolite products due to tissue degradations. Readers are instructed to pay special attention to the boxed-in spectral regions, where the increased intensities of free amino acids such as alanine (1.48 ppm), valine (0.96 ppm) etc. are clearly visible in the 12 h spectrum.