OBJECTIVE: To compare the abilities of human wild-type apoA-I (WT apoA-I) and human apoA-I(Milano) (apoA-I(M)) to promote macrophage reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) in apoA-I-null mice infected with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing either WT apoA-I or apoA-I(M). METHODS AND RESULTS: WT apoA-I- or apoA-I(M)-expressing mice were intraperitoneally injected with [H(3)]cholesterol-labeled J774 mouse macrophages. After 48 hours, no significant difference was detected in the amount of cholesterol removed from the macrophages and deposited in the feces via the RCT pathway between the WT apoA-I and apoA-I(M) groups. Analysis of the individual components of the RCT pathway demonstrated that the apoA-I(M)-expressing mice promoted ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1)-mediated cholesterol efflux as efficiently as WT apoA-I but that apoA-I(M) had a reduced ability to promote cholesterol esterification via lecithin cholesterol-acyltransferase (LCAT). This resulted in reduced cholesteryl ester (CE) and increased free cholesterol (FC) levels in the plasma of mice expressing apoA-I(M) compared to WT apoA-I. These differences did not affect the rate of delivery of labeled cholesterol to the liver via SR-BI-mediated selective uptake or its subsequent excretion in the feces. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the in vivo assay, WT apoA-I and apoA-I(M) are equally efficient at promoting macrophage RCT, suggesting that if apoA-I(M) is more atheroprotective than WT apoA-I it is not attributable to an enhancement of macrophage RCT.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the abilities of human wild-type apoA-I (WT apoA-I) and humanapoA-I(Milano) (apoA-I(M)) to promote macrophage reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) in apoA-I-null mice infected with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing either WT apoA-I or apoA-I(M). METHODS AND RESULTS: WT apoA-I- or apoA-I(M)-expressing mice were intraperitoneally injected with [H(3)]cholesterol-labeled J774mouse macrophages. After 48 hours, no significant difference was detected in the amount of cholesterol removed from the macrophages and deposited in the feces via the RCT pathway between the WT apoA-I and apoA-I(M) groups. Analysis of the individual components of the RCT pathway demonstrated that the apoA-I(M)-expressing mice promoted ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1)-mediated cholesterol efflux as efficiently as WT apoA-I but that apoA-I(M) had a reduced ability to promote cholesterol esterification via lecithin cholesterol-acyltransferase (LCAT). This resulted in reduced cholesteryl ester (CE) and increased free cholesterol (FC) levels in the plasma of mice expressing apoA-I(M) compared to WT apoA-I. These differences did not affect the rate of delivery of labeled cholesterol to the liver via SR-BI-mediated selective uptake or its subsequent excretion in the feces. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the in vivo assay, WT apoA-I and apoA-I(M) are equally efficient at promoting macrophage RCT, suggesting that if apoA-I(M) is more atheroprotective than WT apoA-I it is not attributable to an enhancement of macrophage RCT.
Authors: Maria Pia Adorni; Francesca Zimetti; Jeffrey T Billheimer; Nan Wang; Daniel J Rader; Michael C Phillips; George H Rothblat Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2007-08-29 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Cinzia Parolini; Marta Marchesi; Paolo Lorenzon; Mauro Castano; Elena Balconi; Luigi Miragoli; Linda Chaabane; Alberto Morisetti; Vito Lorusso; Bradley J Martin; Charles L Bisgaier; Brian Krause; Roger S Newton; Cesare R Sirtori; Giulia Chiesa Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Borja Ibanez; Gemma Vilahur; Giovanni Cimmino; Walter S Speidl; Antonio Pinero; Brian G Choi; M Urooj Zafar; Carlos G Santos-Gallego; Brian Krause; Lina Badimon; Valentin Fuster; Juan J Badimon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marta Marchesi; Erin A Booth; Giuseppe Rossoni; Ricardo A García; Knut R Hill; Cesare R Sirtori; Charles L Bisgaier; Benedict R Lucchesi Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Eric T Alexander; Masafumi Tanaka; Momoe Kono; Hiroyuki Saito; Daniel J Rader; Michael C Phillips Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Ginny L Weibel; Eric T Alexander; Michelle R Joshi; Daniel J Rader; Sissel Lund-Katz; Michael C Phillips; George H Rothblat Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2007-07-05 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Sandhya Sankaranarayanan; John F Oram; Bela F Asztalos; Ashley M Vaughan; Sissel Lund-Katz; Maria Pia Adorni; Michael C Phillips; George H Rothblat Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: M Nieuwdorp; M Vergeer; R J Bisoendial; J op 't Roodt; H Levels; R S Birjmohun; J A Kuivenhoven; R Basser; T J Rabelink; J J P Kastelein; E S G Stroes Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-04-04 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Mary G Sorci-Thomas; Manal Zabalawi; Manish S Bharadwaj; Ashley J Wilhelm; John S Owen; Bela F Asztalos; Shaila Bhat; Michael J Thomas Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2011-09-14
Authors: Eric T Alexander; Charulatha Vedhachalam; Sandhya Sankaranarayanan; Margarita de la Llera-Moya; George H Rothblat; Daniel J Rader; Michael C Phillips Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Julian C van Capelleveen; Andrea E Bochem; M Mahdi Motazacker; G Kees Hovingh; John J P Kastelein Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Terence R Flotte; Eric Daniels; Janet Benson; Jeneé M Bevett-Rose; Kenneth Cornetta; Margaret Diggins; Julie Johnston; Susan Sepelak; Johannes C M van der Loo; James M Wilson; Cheryl L McDonald Journal: Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.032
Authors: Cheng-I J Ma; Jennifer A Beckstead; Airlia Thompson; Anouar Hafiane; Rui Hao Leo Wang; Robert O Ryan; Robert S Kiss Journal: Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 3.626