Literature DB >> 19659735

The case of the vanishing patient? Image and experience.

Mildred Blaxter1.   

Abstract

It has been argued that the new technologies of medicine privilege the image over the actual body and its experience, so that the patients themselves may 'vanish' behind the images. A case study is used to explore this from the patient's point of view. What evidence is there that alienation or other dysfunctional effects can actually happen? In this example of the high-tech medicine of lung cancer treatment, it was demonstrable that the process of diagnosis was not only dependent on, but also in some ways distorted by, the reliance on technologies. It was not necessarily true, however, that the machines and the images themselves proved alienating to the patient, or produced a feeling of disembodiment. It was the system in which they were used, their translation into records and decisions, which was deeply alienating, with only lip-service paid to the principles of patient-centredness or the inclusion of the patient as a partner in decision making. Features of the contemporary British health service which seem to foster this are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19659735     DOI: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2009.01178.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  4 in total

1.  Using quantitative risk information in decisions about statins: a qualitative study in a community setting.

Authors:  Louisa Polak; Judith Green
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.

Authors:  Anne Kerr; Emily Ross; Gwen Jacques; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2018-02-15

3.  Visualising health risks with medical imaging for changing recipients' health behaviours and risk factors: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Juliet A Usher-Smith; Rana Hasan; Florence Alexander; Natasha Clarke; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  To see or not to see: a qualitative interview study of patients' views on their own diagnostic images.

Authors:  Leslie E Carlin; Helen E Smith; Flis Henwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.