BACKGROUND: We undertook a pilot investigation to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for intraoperative assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: We evaluated ICE intraoperative imaging of left ventricular (LV) function and aortic valvular flow as well as safety of implementation. ICE was used to guide CRT system lead placement, assess impact of pacing modes, and optimization of device programming. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent ICE imaging. ICE showed global hypokinesis in six patients, regional wall motion abnormality only in 10 patients, and both in seven patients. Optimized CRT modes included mean atrioventricular (AV) interval of 170 ms and interventricular timing using simultaneous right ventricular (RV)-LV pacing (five patients), LV pacing only (one patient), and sequential LV to RV stimulation (15 patients) or RV to LV stimulation (two patients). ICE-guided CRT acutely improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 24 +/- 9% to 41 +/- 1% (P < 0.00001). During follow-up of 3-24 (mean 11) months, New York Heart Association class improved in all patients from a mean of 3.2 +/- 0.4 at implant to 1.6 +/- 0.7 (P < 0.0001), with improvement of LVEF from 19 +/- 7% to 34 +/- 12% (P = 0.0001). Actuarial survival was 83% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: (1) ICE imaging is reliable and safe for continuous intraoperative imaging of LV wall motion, and assesses baseline status and impact of CRT interventions.(2) Intraoperative ICE-guided CRT optimization resulted in an increase in LVEF acutely and consistent improvement in heart failure.(3) Sequential biventricular pacing and longer AV interval programming were more often used in ICE-guided CRT.
BACKGROUND: We undertook a pilot investigation to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for intraoperative assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: We evaluated ICE intraoperative imaging of left ventricular (LV) function and aortic valvular flow as well as safety of implementation. ICE was used to guide CRT system lead placement, assess impact of pacing modes, and optimization of device programming. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent ICE imaging. ICE showed global hypokinesis in six patients, regional wall motion abnormality only in 10 patients, and both in seven patients. Optimized CRT modes included mean atrioventricular (AV) interval of 170 ms and interventricular timing using simultaneous right ventricular (RV)-LV pacing (five patients), LV pacing only (one patient), and sequential LV to RV stimulation (15 patients) or RV to LV stimulation (two patients). ICE-guided CRT acutely improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 24 +/- 9% to 41 +/- 1% (P < 0.00001). During follow-up of 3-24 (mean 11) months, New York Heart Association class improved in all patients from a mean of 3.2 +/- 0.4 at implant to 1.6 +/- 0.7 (P < 0.0001), with improvement of LVEF from 19 +/- 7% to 34 +/- 12% (P = 0.0001). Actuarial survival was 83% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: (1) ICE imaging is reliable and safe for continuous intraoperative imaging of LV wall motion, and assesses baseline status and impact of CRT interventions.(2) Intraoperative ICE-guided CRT optimization resulted in an increase in LVEF acutely and consistent improvement in heart failure.(3) Sequential biventricular pacing and longer AV interval programming were more often used in ICE-guided CRT.
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Christopher K Johnson; Santos E Cabreriza; Rana L Sahar; Alexander Rusanov; Daniel Y Wang; Bin Cheng; Mira S Gendy; T Alexander Quinn; Henry Michael Spotnitz Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.872