Literature DB >> 19659466

p53 expression in patients with advanced urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Christian Bolenz, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Yves Fradet, Raheela Ashfaq, Patrick J Bastian, Matthew E Nielsen, Umberto Capitanio, Claudio Jeldres, Jérôme Rigaud, Stefan C Müller, Seth P Lerner, Francesco Montorsi, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Richard J Cote, Yair Lotan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether assessing p53 expression could improve the ability to predict disease recurrence and disease-specific survival in a multi-institutional cohort of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 692 patients with pT3-4 N0 or pTany N+ UCB treated with radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy. The predictive accuracy (PA) was quantified using the 200 bootstrap-corrected concordance index. The base model comprised age, gender, stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, number of lymph nodes removed, number of lymph nodes positive, concomitant carcinoma in situ, and adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: p53 expression was altered in 341 (49.3%) patients. In multivariable analyses, p53 expression was independently associated with disease recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.66; P < 0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.65, P < 0.001). Overall, adding p53 did not significantly improve the PA of the base model (recurrence +0.7%, P = 0.085, and cancer-specific mortality +1.2%, P = 0.050). In the subgroups of pT3N0 (280) and pT4N0 (83) patients, p53 slightly improved the PA of the base model by a statistically significant degree (recurrence +1.7% and +3.6%, respectively; cancer-specific mortality +1.9% and +3.5%, respectively; all P < 0.001). In 329 patients with pTany N+ disease p53 status did not improve the PA of the base model.
CONCLUSION: While assessing p53 expression has limited utility in patients with lymph node-positive UCB, it marginally improves prognostication in patients with advanced non-metastatic UCB. Integration of p53 into a panel of biomarkers might be necessary to capture a more accurate picture of the biological potential of advanced UCB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19659466     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08742.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  21 in total

Review 1.  Biomolecular predictors of urothelial cancer behavior and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Rink; Eugene K Cha; David Green; Jens Hansen; Brian D Robinson; Yair Lotan; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Felix K Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Margit Fisch; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Stat3 activation in urothelial stem cells leads to direct progression to invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Philip Levy Ho; Erica Julianne Lay; Weiguo Jian; Diana Parra; Keith Syson Chan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Biomarkers for prognosis and treatment selection in advanced bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuanbin Ru; Garrett M Dancik; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Genome-wide methylation profiling and the PI3K-AKT pathway analysis associated with smoking in urothelial cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mariana Brait; Enrico Munari; Cynthia LeBron; Maartje G Noordhuis; Shahnaz Begum; Christina Michailidi; Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon; Leonel Maldonado; Tanusree Sen; Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Leslie Cope; Paola Parrella; Vito Michele Fazio; Patrick K Ha; George J Netto; David Sidransky; Mohammad O Hoque
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Distinct patterns and behaviour of urothelial carcinoma with respect to anatomical location: how molecular biomarkers can augment clinico-pathological predictors in upper urinary tract tumours.

Authors:  David R Yates; James W F Catto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Molecular substratification of bladder cancer: moving towards individualized patient management.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-03-28

7.  MiR-34a chemosensitizes bladder cancer cells to cisplatin treatment regardless of p53-Rb pathway status.

Authors:  Ruth L Vinall; Alexandra Z Ripoll; Sisi Wang; Chong-Xian Pan; Ralph W deVere White
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Molecular genetics of bladder cancer: Emerging mechanisms of tumor initiation and progression.

Authors:  David J McConkey; Sangkyou Lee; Woonyoung Choi; Mai Tran; Tadeusz Majewski; Sooyong Lee; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Colin Dinney; Bogdan Czerniak
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  Molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: are we there yet?

Authors:  George J Netto
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Emerging critical role of molecular testing in diagnostic genitourinary pathology.

Authors:  George J Netto; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.