Literature DB >> 19658444

Efficacy and safety of etanercept in psoriasis after switching from other treatments: an observational study.

Annamaria Mazzotta1, Maria Esposito, Antonio Costanzo, Sergio Chimenti.   

Abstract

Since targeted biologic treatments have been introduced for the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, switching between different medications has become necessary in selected patients, particularly after treatment failures. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept treatment in adult patients with psoriasis after failure to respond to other previous therapies. In particular, the differences in efficacy profiles after switching from traditional (cyclosporine [ciclosporin], methotrexate, retinoids, fumaric acid esters, psoralen plus UVA therapy, corticosteroids) or biologic (infliximab, efalizumab) treatments were analyzed. The study included 124 patients affected by plaque-type psoriasis who received etanercept administered subcutaneously at a dosage of 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks, followed by 25 mg twice weekly for an additional 12 weeks, and 110 patients affected by psoriatic arthritis who were treated with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly in a continuous regimen, after a 12-week period of treatment with etanercept 50 mg twice weekly. Efficacy results were consistent in both groups of patients (plaque-type psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis), as expressed by the percentage of patients who achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50 and PASI 75 scores. Among psoriatic arthritis patients, the mean pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score showed a substantial reduction during the treatment course, from 67.2 at week 0 to 15.8 at week 24. After 24 weeks, among patients with plaque-type psoriasis who had not previously received biologic therapies, 89.9% of patients achieved PASI 50 and 75.3% achieved PASI 75, while among patients who had received biologic therapies, 69.6% of patients achieved PASI 50 and 65.2% achieved PASI 75. In addition, 92.3% of patients with psoriatic arthritis who had not previously received biologic therapies achieved PASI 50 and 73.8% achieved PASI 75, while among patients who had received biologic therapies, 45.8% of patients achieved PASI 50 and 29.2% achieved PASI 75. Our study demonstrated that etanercept was more effective in those patients who had not previously received other biologic therapies than in those who had. The results of the present study indicate that etanercept may represent a valid, effective, and well tolerated therapeutic alternative even after failure to respond to traditional and other biologic therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19658444     DOI: 10.2165/11310770-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol        ISSN: 1175-0561            Impact factor:   7.403


  11 in total

Review 1.  Real-world effectiveness of anti-TNF switching in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Soumya M Reddy; Sheila Crean; Amber L Martin; Meghan D Burns; Jacqueline B Palmer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Heterogeneity of response to biologic treatment: perspective for psoriasis.

Authors:  Emily Edson-Heredia; Kimberly L Sterling; Carlos I Alatorre; Gebra Cuyun Carter; Rosirene Paczkowski; Victoria Zarotsky; Tomoko Maeda-Chubachi
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 3.  A Review of Switching Biologic Agents in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

Authors:  Yifan Hu; Zeyu Chen; Yu Gong; Yuling Shi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Large-scale, prospective, observational studies in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A systematic and critical review.

Authors:  Sue Langham; Julia Langham; Hans-Peter Goertz; Mark Ratcliffe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Adherence, satisfaction and preferences for treatment in patients with psoriasis in the European Union: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I Belinchón; R Rivera; C Blanch; M Comellas; L Lizán
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR).

Authors:  Ireny Y K Iskandar; Richard B Warren; Mark Lunt; Kayleigh J Mason; Ian Evans; Kathleen McElhone; Catherine H Smith; Nick J Reynolds; Darren M Ashcroft; Christopher E M Griffiths
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 7.590

7.  Comparative effectiveness of biological therapies on improvements in quality of life in patients with psoriasis.

Authors:  I Y K Iskandar; D M Ashcroft; R B Warren; M Lunt; K McElhone; C H Smith; N J Reynolds; C E M Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Efficacy of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior biologic therapy: an integrated analysis of the phase III UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 studies.

Authors:  B Strober; A Menter; C Leonardi; K Gordon; J Lambert; L Puig; H Photowala; M Longcore; T Zhan; P Foley
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Treatment outcomes with ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who have or have not received prior biological therapies: an integrated analysis of two Phase III randomized studies.

Authors:  A B Gottlieb; J-P Lacour; N Korman; S Wilhelm; Y Dutronc; A Schacht; J Erickson; L Zhang; L Mallbris; S Gerdes
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 10.  An evolution in switching therapy for psoriasis patients who fail to meet treatment goals.

Authors:  Francisco Kerdel; Martin Zaiac
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.