Literature DB >> 19657924

Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.

Talya Miron-Shatz1, Yaniv Hanoch, Dana Graef, Michal Sagi.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of presentation formats (frequency, 1-in-N, and visual) and numeracy level on students' understanding of prenatal screening results, as well as their risk assessment for having a fetus with Down syndrome. Frequency format (vs. 1-in-N and visual formats) improved participants' ability to accurately assess the chances of having a fetus with Down syndrome, and was associated with lower risk estimates. High numeracy levels were associated with a better ability to judge risk likelihood. For individuals of low numeracy levels, however, the frequency format significantly facilitated accurate understanding of probability information. This suggests that presenting information in frequency format is particularly beneficial for certain populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19657924     DOI: 10.1080/10810730903032986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  11 in total

Review 1.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Factors affecting recall of different types of personal genetic information about Alzheimer's disease risk: the REVEAL study.

Authors:  Andria G Besser; Saskia C Sanderson; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Kurt D Christensen; Denise M Lautenbach; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Big Data in Science and Healthcare: A Review of Recent Literature and Perspectives. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group.

Authors:  M M Hansen; T Miron-Shatz; A Y S Lau; C Paton
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10

6.  Effect of format on comprehension of adherence data in chronic disease: A cross-sectional study in HIV.

Authors:  Anita Lyons; Warren B Bilker; Janet Hines; Robert Gross
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-08-04

7.  Cool but counterproductive: interactive, Web-based risk communications can backfire.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Mark Dickson; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Informed Choice for Participation in Down Syndrome Screening: Development and Content of a Web-Based Decision Aid.

Authors:  Mette Maria Skjøth; Helle Ploug Hansen; Eva Draborg; Claus Duedal Pedersen; Ronald F Lamont; Jan Stener Jørgensen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-09-21

9.  Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Holly O Witteman; Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis; Nicole L Exe; Valerie C Kahn; Mark Dickson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Exploring Genetic Numeracy Skills in a Sample of U.S. University Students.

Authors:  Margo W Bergman; Patricia Goodson; Heather Honoré Goltz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.