Literature DB >> 19657852

DCE-MRI parameters have potential to predict response of locally advanced breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and hyperthermia: a pilot study.

Oana I Craciunescu1, Kimberly L Blackwell, Ellen L Jones, James R Macfall, Daohai Yu, Zeljko Vujaskovic, Terence Z Wong, Vlayka Liotcheva, Eric L Rosen, Leonard R Prosnitz, Thaddeus V Samulski, Mark W Dewhirst.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Combined therapies represent a staple of modern medicine. For women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA ChT) for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), early determination of whether the patient will fail to respond can enable the use of alternative, more beneficial therapies. This is even more desirable when the combined therapy includes hyperthermia (HT), an efficient way to improve drug delivery, however, more costly and time consuming. There is data showing that this goal can be achieved using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast agent (CA) enhancement. This work for the first time proposes combining the information extracted from pre-treatment MR imaging into a morpho-physiological tumour score (MPTS) with the hypothesis that this score will increase the prognostic efficacy, compared to each of its MR-derived components: morphological (derived from the shape of the tumour enhancement) and physiological (derived from the CA enhancement variance dynamics parameters). The MPTS was correlated with response as determined by both pathologic residual tumour and MRI imaging, and was shown to have potential to predict response. The MPTS was extracted from pre-treatment MRI parameters, so independent of the combined therapy used.
PURPOSE: To use a novel morpho-physiological tumour score (MPTS) generated from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to predict response to treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A protocol was designed to acquire DCE-MRI images of 20 locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA ChT) and hyperthermia (HT). Imaging was done over 30 min following bolus injection of gadopentetate-based contrast agent. Parametric maps were generated by fitting the signal intensity to a double exponential curve and were used to derive a morphological characterisation of the lesions. Enhancement-variance dynamics parameters, wash-in and wash-out parameters (WiP, WoP), were extracted. The morphological characterisation and the WiP and WoP were combined into a MPTS with the intent of achieving better prognostic efficacy. The MPTS was correlated with response to NA therapy as determined by pathological residual tumour and MRI imaging.
RESULTS: The contrast agent in all tumours typically peaked in the first 1-4 min. The tumours' WiP and WoP varied considerably. The MPTS was highly correlated with whether the patients had a pathological response. This scoring system has a specificity of 78% and a sensitivity of 91% for predicting response to NA chemotherapy. The kappa was 0.69 with a 95% confidence interval of [0.38, 1] and a p-value of 0.002.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study shows that the MPTS derived using pre-treatment MRI images has the potential to predict response to NA ChT and HT in LABC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the validity of these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19657852      PMCID: PMC2783501          DOI: 10.1080/02656730903022700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  37 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: user-defined versus semi-automated region-of-interest analysis.

Authors:  G P Liney; P Gibbs; C Hayes; M O Leach; L W Turnbull
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; H H Schild
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Authors:  T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  An overview of interpretation strategies for breast MR imaging.

Authors:  M D Schnall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  D M Ikeda; N M Hylton; K Kinkel; M G Hochman; C K Kuhl; W A Kaiser; J C Weinreb; S F Smazal; H Degani; P Viehweg; J Barclay; M D Schnall
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Breast MR imaging in the diagnostic setting.

Authors:  Mitchell Schnall; Susan Orel
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.

Authors:  P J Drew; M J Kerin; T Mahapatra; C Malone; J R Monson; L W Turnbull; J N Fox
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 8.  Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  N M Hylton
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  3D numerical reconstruction of the hyperthermia induced temperature distribution in human sarcomas using DE-MRI measured tissue perfusion: validation against non-invasive MR temperature measurements.

Authors:  O I Craciunescu; S K Das; R L McCauley; J R MacFall; T V Samulski
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.914

10.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of breast cancer using dynamic MRI with high temporal resolution.

Authors:  K Wasser; S K Klein; C Fink; H Junkermann; H P Sinn; I Zuna; M V Knopp; S Delorme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  22 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: correlation between the baseline MR imaging findings and responses to therapy.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Sachiko Yuen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A phase I/II study of neoadjuvant liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and hyperthermia in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Zeljko Vujaskovic; Dong W Kim; Ellen Jones; Lan Lan; Linda McCall; Mark W Dewhirst; Oana Craciunescu; Paul Stauffer; Vlayka Liotcheva; Allison Betof; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 3.  Utility of functional imaging in prediction or assessment of treatment response and prognosis following thermotherapy.

Authors:  Mark W Dewhirst; Donald E Thrall; Gregory Palmer; Thies Schroeder; Zeljko Vujaskovic; H Cecil Charles; James Macfall; Terence Wong
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

4.  Genomic profiling in locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer and its link to DCE-MRI and overall survival.

Authors:  Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Kouros Owzar; Chen Jiang; Peter M Scarbrough; Oana I Craciunescu; Janet K Horton; Holly K Dressman; Kimberly L Blackwell; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Radiation induces aerobic glycolysis through reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Jim Zhong; Narasimhan Rajaram; David M Brizel; Amy E Frees; Nirmala Ramanujam; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Variability in Quantitative DCE-MRI: Sources and Solutions.

Authors:  Harrison Kim
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2018

7.  Assessment of Treatment Response With Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Single-Dose Preoperative Radiotherapy: Initial Results.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Janet K Horton; Fang-Fang Yin; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-01

8.  Early prediction of the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative MRI and machine learning.

Authors:  Subramani Mani; Yukun Chen; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Sandeep R Bhave; E Brian Welch; Mia A Levy; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

9.  Host genetic modifiers of nonproductive angiogenesis inhibit breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Flister; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Alexander Stoddard; Cody Plasterer; Jaidip Jagtap; Abdul K Parchur; Gayatri Sharma; Anthony R Prisco; Angela Lemke; Dana Murphy; Mona Al-Gizawiy; Michael Straza; Sophia Ran; Aron M Geurts; Melinda R Dwinell; Andrew S Greene; Carmen Bergom; Peter S LaViolette; Amit Joshi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Is there any correlation between model-based perfusion parameters and model-free parameters of time-signal intensity curve on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Boram Yi; Doo Kyoung Kang; Dukyong Yoon; Yong Sik Jung; Ku Sang Kim; Hyunee Yim; Tae Hee Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.