Literature DB >> 19657576

Anatomy-specific pancreatic stump management to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Yoshitsugu Tajima1, Tamotsu Kuroki, Noritsugu Tsuneoka, Tomohiko Adachi, Taiichiro Kosaka, Tatsuya Okamoto, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Susumu Eguchi, Takashi Kanematsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anatomical status of the pancreatic remnant after a pancreatic head resection varies greatly among patients. The aim of the present study was to improve management of the pancreatic remnant for reducing pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.
METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients who underwent an end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatic head resection were included in the study. To approximate the pancreatic stump to the jejunum, the transfixing and interrupted suture techniques were used in 51 and 44 patients, respectively. We modified the interrupted suture technique according to the anatomical status of the pancreatic remnant, i.e., the shape of the pancreatic stump and the location of the pancreatic duct.
RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in this study. Overall, 14 patients (15%) developed a clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. Certain anatomical features, including a small pancreatic duct, a soft, nonfibrotic pancreatic gland, and a pancreatic duct adjacent to the posterior cut edge, were significantly associated with pancreatic fistula. The fistula rate in the interrupted suture group was 7%, lower than that (22%) in the transfixing suture group (P = 0.036), and it was not influenced by pancreatic anatomy. Multivariate analysis identified a nonfibrotic pancreas (versus fibrotic pancreas; odds ratio [OR] 12.58, 95% CI 1.2-23.9; P = 0.001), a soft pancreas (versus hard pancreas; OR 4.67, CI 1.2-51.1; P = 0.006), and the transfixing suture technique (versus interrupted suture technique; OR 9.91, CI 1.7-57.5; P = 0.003) as significant predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic anastomosis modified according to the pancreatic anatomy is effective in reducing the risk of pancreatic fistula formation with end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatic head resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19657576     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0179-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  41 in total

1.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant.

Authors:  M I van Berge Henegouwen; L T De Wit; T M Van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Use of ultrasonically activated shears improves the safety of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Tsuneo Tanaka; Yasuhiro Matsugu; Yasuhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-11

4.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

5.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: do we need further studies?

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Sajid S Qureshi; Nanda Rajneesh; Parul J Shukla
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the risk of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ryo Hosotani; Ryuichiro Doi; Masayuki Imamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Omental wrapping of skeletonized major vessels after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Isao Kurosaki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun

9.  Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S G Marcus; H Cohen; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  No mortality after 150 consecutive pancreatoduodenctomies with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naoya Nakagawa; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple's Operation Pancreatic Fistula?

Authors:  Nikhil S; P J Halder; Santhosh R; Ravindra N
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-11

2.  Nutritional risk index as an independent predictive factor for the development of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hiroji Shinkawa; Shigekazu Takemura; Takahiro Uenishi; Masayuki Sakae; Kazunori Ohata; Yorihisa Urata; Kazuhisa Kaneda; Akinori Nozawa; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Assessment of acute obstructive pancreatitis by magnetic resonance imaging: Predicting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhenshan Shi; Xiumei Li; Yueming Li; Ruixiong You; Dairong Cao; Qunlin Chen; Kamisha Ramen; Vikash Sahadeo Loosa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09

4.  Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Tarek Salah; Ahmad Sultan; Mohamed El Hemaly; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Emad Hamdy; Ehab Atef; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmed El-Geidie; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Talaat Abdallah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Unraveling Pancreatic Segmentation.

Authors:  Yohann Renard; Louis de Mestier; Manuela Perez; Claude Avisse; Philippe Lévy; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.