Sang-Hoon Park1, Sharon L Brooks, Tae-Ju Oh, Hom-Lay Wang. 1. Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. spark@umaryland.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed conventional tomograms to estimate the prognostic value of the cross-sectional ridge morphology on the clinical outcome of guided bone regeneration (GBR). METHODS: Presurgical conventional tomograms of 23 single-implant sites were analyzed retrospectively in 20 patients. All sites had a non-space-making buccal dehiscence defect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant. Simultaneous GBR procedures were performed, and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Measurements at baseline and at the 6-month reentry included defect height (from smooth-rough junction to the most apical part of the defect) and horizontal bone gain at three locations (smooth-rough junction, middle, and most apical portion of the defect). All measurements were taken from a reference template. Tomographic parameters included the implant-associated ridge angle and width measured at 6 mm below the alveolar crest and at the most apical point of the implant. Implant exposure and the presence of the barrier membrane were controlled for during statistical analyses. RESULTS: The presurgical ridge angle had a significant negative correlation with the percentage of defect height reduction (r = -0.621; P = 0.002) and horizontal bone gain (r = -0.469; P = 0.024). This difference remained significant even after controlling for implant/membrane exposure (P = 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). A statistically and clinically greater percentage of defect height reduction was observed for ridge angles <28 degrees (P = 0.023). Ridge width did not have a significant effect on the regenerative outcome. CONCLUSION: Cross-sectional presurgical ridge angles may have prognostic value in estimating the outcome of simultaneous GBR.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed conventional tomograms to estimate the prognostic value of the cross-sectional ridge morphology on the clinical outcome of guided bone regeneration (GBR). METHODS: Presurgical conventional tomograms of 23 single-implant sites were analyzed retrospectively in 20 patients. All sites had a non-space-making buccal dehiscence defect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant. Simultaneous GBR procedures were performed, and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Measurements at baseline and at the 6-month reentry included defect height (from smooth-rough junction to the most apical part of the defect) and horizontal bone gain at three locations (smooth-rough junction, middle, and most apical portion of the defect). All measurements were taken from a reference template. Tomographic parameters included the implant-associated ridge angle and width measured at 6 mm below the alveolar crest and at the most apical point of the implant. Implant exposure and the presence of the barrier membrane were controlled for during statistical analyses. RESULTS: The presurgical ridge angle had a significant negative correlation with the percentage of defect height reduction (r = -0.621; P = 0.002) and horizontal bone gain (r = -0.469; P = 0.024). This difference remained significant even after controlling for implant/membrane exposure (P = 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). A statistically and clinically greater percentage of defect height reduction was observed for ridge angles <28 degrees (P = 0.023). Ridge width did not have a significant effect on the regenerative outcome. CONCLUSION: Cross-sectional presurgical ridge angles may have prognostic value in estimating the outcome of simultaneous GBR.
Authors: Paolo Tonelli; Marco Duvina; Luigi Barbato; Eleonora Biondi; Niccolò Nuti; Leila Brancato; Giovanna Delle Rose Journal: Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab Date: 2011-09