Literature DB >> 19655605

Temporary intravascular shunts: when are we really using them according to the NTDB?

Chad G Ball1, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Ravi R Rajani, Amy D Wyrzykowski, Christopher J Dente, Gary A Vercruysse, Paul Mcbeth, Jeffrey M Nicholas, Jeffrey P Salomone, Grace S Rozycki, David V Feliciano.   

Abstract

Temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) are synthetic intraluminal conduits that maintain arterial and/or venous blood flow. This technique can be used for: 1) replantation; 2) open extremity fractures with extensive soft tissue and arterial injuries; or 3) damage control (extremity/truncal). The literature defining TIVS is composed exclusively of small case series (primarily penetrating injuries). Our goal was to identify the injured population who actually undergoes TIVS using the National Trauma Data Bank (2001 to 2005). TIVS were placed in 395 patients (mean Injury Severity Score = 26; initial hemodynamic instability = 24%; mean based deficit = -7.2; mortality = 14%). Blunt mechanisms caused 64 per cent (251 of 395) of cases. Penetrating injuries were primarily gunshot wounds (97%). Concurrent severe extremity fractures and/or soft tissue defects were present in 185 (74%) blunt-injured patients. Only six of 111 centers performing TIVS used this technique five or more times. Only three centers used TIVS more than 10 times. The volume of TIVS use was similar across the study period (P > 0.05). TIVS is primarily used in blunt motor vehicle collision trauma with concurrent severe extremity fractures and soft tissue injuries. This provides distal perfusion while surgeons assess/fixate the limb. TIVS are placed relatively uncommonly by a large number of trauma centers with a few hospitals using them much more frequently for penetrating injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19655605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Temporary vascular shunts.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; A Subramanian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Damage control resuscitation: history, theory and technique.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Current management of penetrating torso trauma: nontherapeutic is not good enough anymore.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Penetrating nontorso trauma: the extremities.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Catheter-based endovascular damage-control (CDET): current status and future directions.

Authors:  Paula Ferrada; Rahul J Anand; Michel Aboutanos; Rao Ivatury
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Vascular Shunts in Civilian Trauma.

Authors:  Adham N Abou Ali; Karim M Salem; Louis H Alarcon; Graciela Bauza; Emmanuel Pikoulis; Rabih A Chaer; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-07-20

7.  Stopping extremity hemorrhage: More than just a tourniquet.

Authors:  Neil G Parry
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2021-11-17

8.  The impact of shorter prehospital transport times on outcomes in patients with abdominal vascular injuries.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Brian H Williams; Clarisse Tallah; Jeffrey P Salomone; David V Feliciano
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2013-12-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.