Literature DB >> 19653589

Medical pluralism in India: patient choice or no other options?

Helen E Sheehan1.   

Abstract

The maldistribution of biomedical services creates a dilemma for Indian patients. They encounter a bewildering array of medical services, ranging from qualified traditional medical practitioners to untrained, self-taught purveyors of medicines and cures. Research on Indian healthcare has decried the inefficient distribution of services in rural and urban areas. The studies discussed here reveal the ground reality of the consequences of limited choices for patients, characterised as "forced pluralism," with no state regulation of type of care, quality of care, or credentials of practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19653589     DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2009.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0974-8466


  4 in total

1.  Utilization of alternative systems of medicine as health care services in India: Evidence on AYUSH care from NSS 2014.

Authors:  Shalini Rudra; Aakshi Kalra; Abhishek Kumar; William Joe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Is 'mainstreaming AYUSH' the right policy for Meghalaya, northeast India?

Authors:  Sandra Albert; John Porter
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.659

3.  Is semen loss syndrome a psychological or physical illness? A case for conflict of interest.

Authors:  Shivanand Kattimani; Vikas Menon; Manohar Kant Shrivastava
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2013-10

4.  Informal rural healthcare providers in North and South India.

Authors:  Meenakshi Gautham; K M Shyamprasad; Rajesh Singh; Anshi Zachariah; Rajkumari Singh; Gerald Bloom
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.