AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of spot urinary Na/K and Na/creatinine (Cr) ratios as an alternative to 24-h urinary sodium in monitoring dietary compliance in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites treated with diuretics. METHODS: The study was carried on 40 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites treated with diuretic therapy. Patients were divided into two groups according to 24-h urinary sodium. We measured spot urine Na/K ratio, Na/Cr ratio and 24-h urinary sodium. Student's t test was used to compare the interval variables and chi(2) test to compare the nominal variables between the two groups. Receiver operator characteristic curve was used to identify the best cutoff point for Na/K and Na/Cr ratio. RESULTS: The best cutoff point for Na/K ratio was 2.5 (P < 0.001) and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9, and for Na/Cr ratio, the best cutoff point was 35 (P < 0.001) and AUC was 0.885. Na/K ratio showed higher sensitivity and accuracy compared to Na/Cr ratio (87.5% and 87% for Na/K ratio; 81% and 85% for Na/Cr ratio, respectively). CONCLUSION: Spot urine Na/K ratio has adequate accuracy for assessment of dietary sodium restriction compared with 24-h urinary sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites.
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of spot urinary Na/K and Na/creatinine (Cr) ratios as an alternative to 24-h urinary sodium in monitoring dietary compliance in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites treated with diuretics. METHODS: The study was carried on 40 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites treated with diuretic therapy. Patients were divided into two groups according to 24-h urinary sodium. We measured spot urine Na/K ratio, Na/Cr ratio and 24-h urinary sodium. Student's t test was used to compare the interval variables and chi(2) test to compare the nominal variables between the two groups. Receiver operator characteristic curve was used to identify the best cutoff point for Na/K and Na/Cr ratio. RESULTS: The best cutoff point for Na/K ratio was 2.5 (P < 0.001) and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9, and for Na/Cr ratio, the best cutoff point was 35 (P < 0.001) and AUC was 0.885. Na/K ratio showed higher sensitivity and accuracy compared to Na/Cr ratio (87.5% and 87% for Na/K ratio; 81% and 85% for Na/Cr ratio, respectively). CONCLUSION: Spot urine Na/K ratio has adequate accuracy for assessment of dietary sodium restriction compared with 24-h urinary sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites.
Authors: Edoardo G Giannini; Atif Zaman; Anna Kreil; Annarosa Floreani; Pietro Dulbecco; Emanuela Testa; Roya Sohaey; Peter Verhey; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Carlo Mansi; Vincenzo Savarino; Roberto Testa Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: P Ginés; T Berl; M Bernardi; D G Bichet; G Hamon; W Jiménez; J F Liard; P Y Martin; R W Schrier Journal: Hepatology Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Kevin P Moore; Florence Wong; Pere Gines; Mauro Bernardi; Andreas Ochs; Francesco Salerno; Paolo Angeli; Michael Porayko; Richard Moreau; Guadelupe Garcia-Tsao; Wladimiro Jimenez; Ramon Planas; Vicente Arroyo Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Hyun Seok Cho; Geun Tae Park; Young Hoon Kim; Sung Gon Shim; Jin Bae Kim; Oh Young Lee; Ho Soon Choi; Joon Soo Hahm; Min Ho Lee Journal: Taehan Kan Hakhoe Chi Date: 2003-12
Authors: Guruprasad P Aithal; Naaventhan Palaniyappan; Louise China; Suvi Härmälä; Lucia Macken; Jennifer M Ryan; Emilie A Wilkes; Kevin Moore; Joanna A Leithead; Peter C Hayes; Alastair J O'Brien; Sumita Verma Journal: Gut Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Thomas Reiberger; Andreas Püspök; Maria Schoder; Franziska Baumann-Durchschein; Theresa Bucsics; Christian Datz; Werner Dolak; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Armin Finkenstedt; Ivo Graziadei; Stephanie Hametner; Franz Karnel; Elisabeth Krones; Andreas Maieron; Mattias Mandorfer; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Florian Rainer; Philipp Schwabl; Vanessa Stadlbauer; Rudolf Stauber; Herbert Tilg; Michael Trauner; Heinz Zoller; Rainer Schöfl; Peter Fickert Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 1.704