Literature DB >> 19652567

Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: analysis of cases diagnosed intraoperatively.

Mousa Taghipour1, Ali Razmkon, Kan'an Hosseini.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study of cases with conjoined lumbar nerve root anomalies.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a description of presenting symptoms and clinical signs of conjoined nerve roots. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nerve root anomalies are frequently underrecognized on advanced imaging studies and are also underappreciated and underreported when encountered surgically.
METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we report the intraoperative identification of 22 cases of conjoined nerve root anomaly, encountered within a period of 11 years. All cases underwent hemilaminectomy in addition to medial facetectomy and pediculectomy. All patients were followed for a mean duration of 53+/-8.2 months (range, 2 to 108 mo).
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had conjoined nerve root anomaly (mean age at diagnosis=47.7+/-5.1). They included 11 cases of L5-S1, 10 cases of L4-L5, and 1 of S1-S2. Twelve patients (54.5%) had symptoms in 2 territories. Straight leg raising sign and crossed straight leg raising were positive in 14 (63.6%) and 7 (31.8%) patients, respectively. All patients returned to work within 2 months after surgery. The signs and symptoms in only 7 cases (31.8%) could be explained by the underlying pathology (disc herniation) alone. In the remaining 68%, the conjoined roots have probably contributed to the incompatible signs and symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Twin dermatomal involvements, in addition to a negative Lasègue sign, are clues to the diagnosis of a probable conjoined nerve root anomaly. Extension of routine hemilaminectomy to a facetectomy and partial pediculectomy leads to a favorable outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19652567     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818f00a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nerve root anomalies: making sense of a complicated literature.

Authors:  Cameron K Schmidt; Tarush Rustagi; Fernando Alonso; Marios Loukas; Jens R Chapman; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Identification of abnormalities in the lumbar nerve tract using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography.

Authors:  Hiroaki Manabe; Toshinori Sakai; Ryo Miyagi; Fumitake Tezuka; Kazuta Yamashita; Yoichiro Takata; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical features of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots versus lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.

Authors:  R Lotan; A Al-Rashdi; A Yee; J Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Conjoined nerve root: about a case].

Authors:  Yannick Canton Kessely; Maguette Gaye Sakho; Alidji Fondo; Akerey Diop Daisy; Aley Thiam; Youssoupha Sakho
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-02-23

5.  Co-occurrence of lumbar spondylolysis and lumbar disc herniation with lumbosacral nerve root anomaly.

Authors:  Tevfik Yılmaz; Yahya Turan; Ismail Gülşen; Sedat Dalbayrak
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2014-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.