Gregory A Abel1, Harold J Burstein, Nathanael D Hevelone, Jane C Weeks. 1. Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Smith 271, Boston, MA 02115, USA. gregory_abel@dfci.harvard.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although cancer-related direct-to-consumer advertising (CR-DTCA) is prevalent, little is known about cancer patients' experiences with this controversial medium of medical communication. METHODS: We administered a 41-item, mailed questionnaire to consecutive patients with breast and hematologic malignancies who were undergoing active treatment at our institution. We assessed awareness of CR-DTCA within the prior year, perceptions of CR-DTCA, and CR-DTCA-prompted patient and provider behaviors. RESULTS: We received 348 completed questionnaires (response rate, 75.0%). Overall, 86.2% reported being aware of CR-DTCA, most frequently from television (77.7%). Awareness did not vary with clinical or sociodemographic factors except that patients were more likely to be aware of CR-DTCA for products specific to their cancer types (P < .0001). A majority of those aware reported that CR-DTCA made them "aware of treatments they did not know about" (62.2%), provided information in "a balanced manner" (65.2%), and helped them to have "better discussions" with their provider (56.8%). These perceptions were significantly more favorable among those who had not graduated from college (P < .05 for each). Overall, 11.2% reported that CR-DTCA made them "less confident" in their providers' judgment. Of those aware, 17.3% reported talking to their provider about an advertised medication, although less than one fifth of those reported receiving a prescription for the advertised medication. CONCLUSION: The patients in our cohort were highly aware of CR-DTCA. CR-DTCA was found to be accessible and useful; however, it decreased some patients' confidence in their providers' judgment. CR-DTCA prompted a modest amount of patient-provider discussion but infrequent patient-reported changes in therapy.
PURPOSE: Although cancer-related direct-to-consumer advertising (CR-DTCA) is prevalent, little is known about cancerpatients' experiences with this controversial medium of medical communication. METHODS: We administered a 41-item, mailed questionnaire to consecutive patients with breast and hematologic malignancies who were undergoing active treatment at our institution. We assessed awareness of CR-DTCA within the prior year, perceptions of CR-DTCA, and CR-DTCA-prompted patient and provider behaviors. RESULTS: We received 348 completed questionnaires (response rate, 75.0%). Overall, 86.2% reported being aware of CR-DTCA, most frequently from television (77.7%). Awareness did not vary with clinical or sociodemographic factors except that patients were more likely to be aware of CR-DTCA for products specific to their cancer types (P < .0001). A majority of those aware reported that CR-DTCA made them "aware of treatments they did not know about" (62.2%), provided information in "a balanced manner" (65.2%), and helped them to have "better discussions" with their provider (56.8%). These perceptions were significantly more favorable among those who had not graduated from college (P < .05 for each). Overall, 11.2% reported that CR-DTCA made them "less confident" in their providers' judgment. Of those aware, 17.3% reported talking to their provider about an advertised medication, although less than one fifth of those reported receiving a prescription for the advertised medication. CONCLUSION: The patients in our cohort were highly aware of CR-DTCA. CR-DTCA was found to be accessible and useful; however, it decreased some patients' confidence in their providers' judgment. CR-DTCA prompted a modest amount of patient-provider discussion but infrequent patient-reported changes in therapy.
Authors: Joel S Weissman; David Blumenthal; Alvin J Silk; Kinga Zapert; Michael Newman; Robert Leitman Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2003 Jan-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jennifer L Malin; Clifford Ko; John Z Ayanian; David Harrington; David R Nerenz; Katherine L Kahn; Julie Ganther-Urmie; Paul J Catalano; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert B Wallace; Edward Guadagnoli; Neeraj K Arora; Maryse D Roudier; Patricia A Ganz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-02-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrew R Robinson; Kirsten B Hohmann; Julie I Rifkin; Daniel Topp; Christine M Gilroy; Jeffrey A Pickard; Robert J Anderson Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004-02-23
Authors: Laura B Vater; Julie M Donohue; Robert Arnold; Douglas B White; Edward Chu; Yael Schenker Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Kathy S Albain; Carol M Moinpour; Judith A Petersen; Kenda Burg; John J Crowley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544