Literature DB >> 19651994

A comparison of booster seat use in Canadian provinces with and without legislation.

A Snowdon1, L Rothman, M Slater, C Kolga, A Hussein, P Boase, A Howard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of booster seats continues to be low, despite their effectiveness in reducing injury in motor vehicle collisions. Many jurisdictions have introduced legislation requiring the use of booster seats. To date, there have been no Canadian studies evaluating the effectiveness of legislation on booster seat use.
OBJECTIVES: To describe restraint use among Canadian children aged 4-8 years, and compare booster seat use between provinces/territories with and without legislation.
METHODS: The data were obtained from a National Survey of Child Restraint Use/Misuse conducted between June and August 2006. A roadside observation survey was conducted at 182 sites across Canada. Weighted statistical analyses of differences in proportions were conducted, accounting for sampling stratification and clustering by car effects.
RESULTS: The roadside survey estimated that 24.6% of children aged 4-8 were restrained in booster seats in provinces with legislation, compared with 16.6% in provinces without (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: This is the first Canadian national study using direct observation to determine the effect of legislation on booster seat use. Provinces with legislation had higher booster seat use, but overall rates were still disappointingly low. Ongoing surveillance of child safety seat use and evaluation of effective adjuncts to legislation is required in order to see collision-related child deaths and injuries drop in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651994     DOI: 10.1136/ip.2008.020537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  7 in total

1.  Levels of reconstruction as complementarity in mixed methods research: a social theory-based conceptual framework for integrating qualitative and quantitative research.

Authors:  Linda J Carroll; J Peter Rothe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Evaluation of an education, restraint distribution, and fitting program to promote correct use of age-appropriate child restraints for children aged 3 to 5 years: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Lisa Keay; Kate Hunter; Julie Brown; Judy M Simpson; Lynne E Bilston; Maureen Elliott; Mark Stevenson; Rebecca Q Ivers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The impact of child safety restraint legislation on child injuries in police-reported motor vehicle collisions in British Columbia: An interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Brubacher; Ediriweera Desapriya; Shannon Erdelyi; Herbert Chan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  An evaluation of evidence-based paediatric injury prevention policies across Canada.

Authors:  Alison K Macpherson; Mariana Brussoni; Pamela Fuselli; Tara Middaugh-Bonney; Shannon Piedt; Ian Pike
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Challenges in the Accurate Surveillance of Booster Seat and Bicycle Helmet Usage by Children: Lessons from the Field.

Authors:  Curt Pankratz; Lynne Warda; Caroline Piotrowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Barriers and Enablers to Enacting Child and Youth Related Injury Prevention Legislation in Canada.

Authors:  Linda Rothman; Ian Pike; Kathy Belton; Lise Olsen; Pam Fuselli; Alison Macpherson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Childhood road traffic injuries in Canada - a provincial comparison of transport injury rates over time.

Authors:  Liraz Fridman; Jessica L Fraser-Thomas; Ian Pike; Alison K Macpherson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.