Literature DB >> 19651301

Evolution of the Hox gene complex from an evolutionary ground state.

Walter J Gehring1, Urs Kloter, Hiroshi Suga.   

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider the question of how the ordered clusters of Hox genes arose during evolution. Since ordered Hox clusters are found in all major superphyla, we have to assume that the Hox clusters arose before the Cambrian "explosion" giving rise to all of these taxa. Based on his studies of the bithorax complex (BX-C) in Drosophila Lewis considered the ground state to be the mesothoracic segment (T2) since the deletion of all of the genes of the BX-C leads to a transformation of all segments from T3 to A8/9 (the last abdominal segment) into T2 segments. We define the developmental ground state genetically, by assuming that loss-of-function mutants lead to transformations toward the ground state, whereas gain-of-function mutants lead to homeotic transformations away from the ground state. By this definition, T2 also represents the developmental ground state, if one includes the anterior genes, that is, those of the Antennapedia complex. We have reconstructed the evolution of the Hox cluster on the basis of known genetic mechanisms which involve unequal crossover and lead from an urhox gene, first to an anterior and a posterior gene and subsequently to intermediate genes which are progressively inserted, between the anterior and posterior genes. These intermediate genes are recombinant due to unequal crossover, whereas the anterior and posterior genes are not affected and therefore had the longest time to diverge from the urhox gene. The molecular phylogenetic analysis strongly supports this model. We consider the ground state to be both developmental and evolutionary and to represent the prototypic body segment. It corresponds to T2 and is specified by Antennapedia or Hox6, respectively. Experiments in the mouse also suggest that the ground state is a thoracic segment. Evolution leads from the prototypic segment to segmental divergence in both the anterior and posterior direction. The most anterior head and tail segments are specified by homeobox genes localized outside of the cluster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651301     DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88002-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol        ISSN: 0070-2153            Impact factor:   4.897


  36 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Function and specificity of synthetic Hox transcription factors in vivo.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Papadopoulos; Vladana Vukojevic; Yoshitsugu Adachi; Lars Terenius; Rudolf Rigler; Walter J Gehring
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional synthetic Antennapedia genes and the dual roles of YPWM motif and linker size in transcriptional activation and repression.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Papadopoulos; Diana Reséndez-Pérez; Diana L Cárdenas-Chávez; Karina Villanueva-Segura; Ricardo Canales-del-Castillo; Daniel A Felix; Raphael Fünfschilling; Walter J Gehring
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.

Authors:  Li Tian; Sarthok Rasique Rahman; Briana D Ezray; Luca Franzini; James P Strange; Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Regulation of mammalian cell differentiation by long non-coding RNAs.

Authors:  Wenqian Hu; Juan R Alvarez-Dominguez; Harvey F Lodish
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Loss of Krüppel-like factor 6 cripples podocyte mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kopp
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  The genetics of behavioral alcohol responses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Aylin R Rodan; Adrian Rothenfluh
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.230

8.  miR-196 regulates axial patterning and pectoral appendage initiation.

Authors:  Xinjun He; Yi-Lin Yan; Johann K Eberhart; Amaury Herpin; Toni U Wagner; Manfred Schartl; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 9.  I Believe I Can Fly!: Use of Drosophila as a Model Organism in Neuropsychopharmacology Research.

Authors:  Anjana S Narayanan; Adrian Rothenfluh
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Improving Hox protein classification across the major model organisms.

Authors:  Stefanie D Hueber; Georg F Weiller; Michael A Djordjevic; Tancred Frickey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.