Literature DB >> 1965105

Comparative efficacy of daptomycin, vancomycin, and cloxacillin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rats and role of test conditions in this determination.

L Cantoni1, M P Glauser, J Bille.   

Abstract

The in vivo efficacy of daptomycin, a new cell wall-active anti-gram-positive-bacterial agent, was compared to those of cloxacillin and vancomycin in a rat model of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Both methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains were used. When therapy was initiated early (8 h) after infection, at the time when valvular bacterial counts were relatively low (approximately 10(6) CFU/g of vegetation), 3 days of therapy was found to be effective against the MSSA strains whatever the antibiotic regimen. In contrast, when the onset of therapy was delayed up to 15 h after infection, so that higher bacterial counts could develop on the valves (approximately 10(9) CFU/g of vegetation), a longer period of treatment (6 days) was required to cure infection. Under these conditions after 3 days of therapy, daptomycin was more effective than cloxacillin and vancomycin against the MSSA strains. Similarly, daptomycin showed a greater activity than vancomycin against the MRSA strain after 3 days of treatment, but after 6 days both antibiotics were equally effective. Decreasing doses of daptomycin showed decreasing activity: 10 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h (q12h) was better than 5 mg/kg q12h, whereas 5 mg/kg q24h (providing drug levels in blood detectable only during the first 12 h) failed to cure infection. In vitro, daptomycin was highly bactericidal at high concentrations (25 and 60 micrograms/ml, corresponding to peak levels in serum after doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively) and bacteriostatic at lower concentrations (0.5 to 2.5 micrograms/ml, corresponding to trough levels in serum). In conclusion, against low-bacterial-count S. aureus endocarditis, daptomycin showed an efficacy similar to those of vancomycin and cloxacillin. Against high-bacterial-count S. aureus endocarditis, daptomycin showed a higher bactericidal activity than cloxacillin (against the MSSA strains) and vancomycin (against both the MSSA and MRSA strains).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1965105      PMCID: PMC172059          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.12.2348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  11 in total

1.  In vitro activity of LY146032, a new lipopeptide antibiotic, against gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  L Verbist
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Activity of LY146032 compared with that of methicillin, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin against staphylococci as determined by kill-kinetic studies.

Authors:  C W Stratton; C Liu; L S Weeks
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro and in vivo activity of LY 146032, a new cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; S Willey; E Reiszner; P G Spitzer; G Caputo; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Discrepancies between MBC and actual killing of viridans group streptococci by cell-wall-active antibiotics.

Authors:  P R Meylan; P Francioli; M P Glauser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  LY146032 compared with penicillin G in experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by group G streptococci.

Authors:  A S Bayer; J Yih; L Hirano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Daptomycin (LY146032) treatment of experimental enterococcal endocarditis.

Authors:  L M Bush; J A Boscia; D Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Daptomycin (LY146032) for prevention and treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits.

Authors:  S Kennedy; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Natural history of aortic valve endocarditis in rats.

Authors:  E Héraïef; M P Glauser; L R Freedman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Influence of the developmental state of valvular lesions on the antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime in experimental enterococcal infections.

Authors:  P M Sullam; T A Drake; M G Täuber; C J Hackbarth; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Early stages of in vitro killing curve of LY146032 and vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J P Flandrois; G Fardel; G Carret
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases.

Authors:  P S McKinnon; S L Davis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Impact of empirical-therapy selection on outcomes of intravenous drug users with infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; Peggy S McKinnon; Donald P Levine; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Daptomycin bactericidal activity and correlation between disk and broth microdilution method results in testing of Staphylococcus aureus strains with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Thomas R Fritsche; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Efficacies of moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin against experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing various degrees of ciprofloxacin resistance.

Authors:  J M Entenza; Y A Que; J Vouillamoz; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Role of tolerance in treatment and prophylaxis of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin.

Authors:  G P Voorn; J Kuyvenhoven; W H Goessens; W C Schmal-Bauer; P H Broeders; J Thompson; M F Michel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Lack of bactericidal antagonism or synergism in vitro between oxacillin and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Christian Joukhadar; Satish Pillai; Christine Wennersten; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro pharmacodynamic effects of concentration, pH, and growth phase on serum bactericidal activities of daptomycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  K C Lamp; M J Rybak; E M Bailey; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Vancomycin in vitro bactericidal activity and its relationship to efficacy in clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise; George Sakoulas; Alan Forrest; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Daptomycin is effective in treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Francesc Marco; Cristina García de la Mària; Yolanda Armero; Eurídice Amat; Dolors Soy; Asunción Moreno; Ana del Río; Manel Almela; Carlos A Mestres; José M Gatell; María Teresa Jiménez de Anta; José M Miró
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.