Literature DB >> 19651043

Evaluating the performance of the ff99SB force field based on NMR scalar coupling data.

Lauren Wickstrom1, Asim Okur, Carlos Simmerling.   

Abstract

Force-field validation is essential for the identification of weaknesses in current models and the development of more accurate models of biomolecules. NMR coupling and relaxation methods have been used to effectively diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of many existing force fields. Studies using the ff99SB force field have shown excellent agreement between experimental and calculated order parameters and residual dipolar calculations. However, recent studies have suggested that ff99SB demonstrates poor agreement with J-coupling constants for short polyalanines. We performed extensive replica-exchange molecular-dynamics simulations on Ala(3) and Ala(5) in TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew solvent models. Our results suggest that the performance of ff99SB is among the best of currently available models. In addition, scalar coupling constants derived from simulations in the TIP4P-Ew model show a slight improvement over those obtained using the TIP3P model. Despite the overall excellent agreement, the data suggest areas for possible improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651043      PMCID: PMC2718158          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  18 in total

1.  Using PC clusters to evaluate the transferability of molecular mechanics force fields for proteins.

Authors:  Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Viktor Hornak; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Polyproline II helix is the preferred conformation for unfolded polyalanine in water.

Authors:  Mihaly Mezei; Patrick J Fleming; Rajgopal Srinivasan; George D Rose
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-15

3.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

4.  Evaluating rotational diffusion from protein MD simulations.

Authors:  Vance Wong; David A Case
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Toward quantitative interpretation of methyl side-chain dynamics from NMR by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Scott A Showalter; Eric Johnson; Mark Rance; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Quantitative molecular ensemble interpretation of NMR dipolar couplings without restraints.

Authors:  Scott A Showalter; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical?

Authors:  Robert B Best; Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Starting structure dependence of NMR order parameters derived from MD simulations: implications for judging force-field quality.

Authors:  Alrun N Koller; Harald Schwalbe; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Structure and dynamics of the homologous series of alanine peptides: a joint molecular dynamics/NMR study.

Authors:  Jürgen Graf; Phuong H Nguyen; Gerhard Stock; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Structure and dynamics of the Abeta(21-30) peptide from the interplay of NMR experiments and molecular simulations.

Authors:  Nicolas L Fawzi; Aaron H Phillips; Jory Z Ruscio; Michaeleen Doucleff; David E Wemmer; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  72 in total

1.  Three force fields' views of the 3(10) helix.

Authors:  Kalliopi K Patapati; Nicholas M Glykos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Scrutinizing molecular mechanics force fields on the submicrosecond timescale with NMR data.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; David van der Spoel; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Linking well-tempered metadynamics simulations with experiments.

Authors:  Alessandro Barducci; Massimiliano Bonomi; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Comparison of native and non-native ubiquitin oligomers reveals analogous structures and reactivities.

Authors:  Grace H Pham; Ambar S J B Rana; E Nihal Korkmaz; Vivian H Trang; Qiang Cui; Eric R Strieter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Characterizing a partially ordered miniprotein through folding molecular dynamics simulations: Comparison with the experimental data.

Authors:  Athanasios S Baltzis; Nicholas M Glykos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Structural Behavior of the Peptaibol Harzianin HK VI in a DMPC Bilayer: Insights from MD Simulations.

Authors:  Marina Putzu; Sezgin Kara; Sergii Afonin; Stephan L Grage; Andrea Bordessa; Grégory Chaume; Thierry Brigaud; Anne S Ulrich; Tomáš Kubař
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Differences in β-strand populations of monomeric Aβ40 and Aβ42.

Authors:  K Aurelia Ball; Aaron H Phillips; David E Wemmer; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Conformational determinants for the recruitment of ERCC1 by XPA in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) Pathway: structure and dynamics of the XPA binding motif.

Authors:  Elisa Fadda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Role of Molecular Interactions and Protein Rearrangement in the Dissociation Kinetics of p38α MAP Kinase Type-I/II/III Inhibitors.

Authors:  Wanli You; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Speed of conformational change: comparing explicit and implicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Aleksander Drozdetski; Ross C Walker; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.