Literature DB >> 19650754

Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.

J Rosenstock1, C Aguilar-Salinas, E Klein, S Nepal, J List, R Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included a main treatment cohort (MTC) with 401 patients (HbA(1c) > or = 7% and < or =10%) randomized and treated with oral saxagliptin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks and a separate open-label cohort (OLC) with 66 patients (HbA(1c) > 10% and < or =12%) who received saxagliptin 10 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 24 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) < 7%, and changes in postprandial glucose area-under-the-curve (PPG-AUC). Efficacy analyses for continuous variables were performed using an ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward methodology.
RESULTS: In the MTC, saxagliptin demonstrated statistically significant decreases in adjusted mean HbA(1c) changes from baseline (mean, 7.9%) to week 24 (-0.43%, -0.46%, -0.54%) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, vs. +0.19% for placebo (all p < 0.0001). Adjusted mean FPG was significantly reduced from baseline (-15, -9, -17 mg/dL) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, vs. +6 mg/dL for placebo (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0074, p < 0.0001, respectively). More saxagliptin-treated patients achieved HbA(1c) < 7% at week 24 (35% [p = NS], 38% [p = 0.0443], 41% [p = 0.0133]) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, than placebo (24%). PPG-AUC was reduced for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg (-6868, -6896, -8084 mg x min/dL, respectively) vs. placebo (-647 mg x min/dL) with statistical significance demonstrated for saxagliptin 5 mg (p = 0.0002) and 10 mg (p < 0.0001). HbA(1c), FPG, and PPG-AUC reductions were also observed in the OLC at 24 weeks. In the MTC, adverse event frequency was similar across all study arms. No cases of confirmed hypoglycemia (symptoms, with fingerstick glucose < or =50 mg/dL) were observed in either cohort. Saxagliptin was not associated with weight gain. Study limitations included the lack of a control group for the OLC and the use of prespecified rescue criteria, which limited the exposure time during which patients could remain on their originally randomized medication without the introduction of additional antihyperglycemic rescue treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in key parameters of glycemic control vs. placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00121641

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19650754     DOI: 10.1185/03007990903178735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  86 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic study of saxagliptin in healthy Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Li Yang; Conrad K P Tou; Chirag G Patel; June Zhao
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  The role of incretin therapy at different stages of diabetes.

Authors:  Simona Cernea
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2011-11-10

3.  Optimizing the Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Incretin-Based Therapy: Focus on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

Authors:  Mansur Shomali
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2014-01

Review 4.  Pharmacology of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Roberta Baetta; Alberto Corsini
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  [Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes].

Authors:  Edelmiro Menéndez Torre; Francisco Javier Lafita Tejedor; Sara Artola Menéndez; Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés; Angeles Alonso García; Manuel Puig Domingo; José Ramón García Solans; Fernando Alvarez Guisasola; Javier García Alegría; Javier Mediavilla Bravo; Carlos Miranda Fernández-Santos; Ramón Romero González
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  A dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-02

Review 7.  Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Juan José Marín-Peñalver; Iciar Martín-Timón; Cristina Sevillano-Collantes; Francisco Javier Del Cañizo-Gómez
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 8.  A review of the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs.

Authors:  Stephanie Aleskow Stein; Elizabeth Mary Lamos; Stephen N Davis
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.250

9.  Role of saxagliptin as monotherapy or adjunct therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Morali D Sharma
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  The evolving place of incretin-based therapies in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Baptist Gallwitz
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.