Literature DB >> 19650174

The management of painful bone metastases with biphosphonates and palliative radiotherapy: a retrospective evaluation of 372 cases.

U Niang1, S Kamer, Z Ozsaran, A Haydaroglu, S Kilciksiz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the palliation of pain of bone metastases with biphosphonates and different radiotherapy protocols in 372 cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with one of the 3 different radiotherapy protocols: 30 Gy in 10 fractions (group A), 20 Gy in 5 fractions (group B) and 8 Gy in a single fraction (group C). Two patient groups were studied: one with radiotherapy alone and the second with biphosphonates plus radiotherapy. The severity of pain was recorded before treatment. According to the pain relief, two different groups were defined: palliation rate<50% (limited palliation) and >50% (partial palliation), including complete pain relief.
RESULTS: Overall limited and partial palliation rates were 20.2 and 79.8%, respectively (complete pain palliation 24.2%). In the group treated with both external radiotherapy and biphosphonates, limited and partial palliation rates were 19.5 and 80.4%, respectively (p=0.47). For 244 metastatic lesions treated with palliative radiotherapy alone, limited palliation rate was 20.4% and partial palliation rate 79.5%. No differences were detected between the groups with or without biphosphonates treatment in terms of pain palliation. According to the radiotherapy protocol, limited palliation rates in groups A, B, and C were 17.7, 20.3, and 28.5%, respectively (p=0.19, p=0.38, and p=0.26, respectively). Partial palliation rates were 82.2% in group A, 79.6% in group B and 71.4% in group C (p=0.42, p=0.21, and p=0.11, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were detected among the 3 radiotherapy schemes in terms of pain palliation.
CONCLUSION: When combined with palliative radiotherapy, biphosphonates did not have any additive effects on pain palliation in the management of painful bone metastases. In addition, a single radiotherapy fraction provides equal pain palliation as multiple fractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19650174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J BUON        ISSN: 1107-0625            Impact factor:   2.533


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of pain response and functional interference outcomes between spinal and non-spinal bone metastases treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Liang Zeng; Edward Chow; Liying Zhang; Shaelyn Culleton; Lori Holden; Florencia Jon; Luluel Khan; May Tsao; Elizabeth Barnes; Cyril Danjoux; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Patterns of pain and functional improvement in patients with bone metastases after conventional external beam radiotherapy and a telephone validation study.

Authors:  Liang Zeng; Arjun Sahgal; Liying Zhang; Kaitlin Koo; Lori Holden; Florencia Jon; May Tsao; Elizabeth Barnes; Cyril Danjoux; Kristopher Dennis; Luluel Khan; Edward Chow
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-17

3.  Analysis of Pain and Interference Patterns With Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Confirmatory Study.

Authors:  Liang Zeng; Edward Chow; Liying Zhang; Shaelyn Culleton; Lori Holden; Florencia Jon; Luluel Khan; Cassandra Uy; May Tsao; Elizabeth Barnes; Cyril Danjoux; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2011-06-08

4.  Continuous controversy about radiation oncologists' choice of treatment regimens for bone metastases: should we blame doctors, cancer-related features, or design of previous clinical studies?

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Adam Pawinski; Astrid Dalhaug
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.