PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of (a) a glaucoma medication self-efficacy scale and (b) a glaucoma outcome expectations scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two instruments were developed: a glaucoma medication self-efficacy scale and a glaucoma outcome expectations scale. Packets containing (a) the instruments and patient demographic questions and (b) a letter explaining the study were distributed to 225 glaucoma patients from three ophthalmology practices between August and December 2007. The instrument was completed by 191 patients for a response rate of 85%. Principal components factor analysis with a varimax rotation and Cronbach's alpha reliability were used to analyse the data. To assess discriminant validity, we administered the scales and two self-reported measures of adherence in a separate sample of 43 glaucoma patients who were currently using at least one glaucoma medication. RESULTS: Our results yielded a 21-item self-efficacy in overcoming barriers that might interfere with the use of glaucoma medications scale, a 14-item self-efficacy in carrying out specific tasks required to use eye drops correctly scale, and a four-item glaucoma outcome expectations scale. Results of the Cronbach's alpha reliability indicated that the scales are internally consistent. The self-efficacy scales were both significantly associated with two patient self-reported measures of glaucoma medication adherence, which show discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: Eye care providers and researchers can use these scales to identify patients with low self-efficacy in using their glaucoma medications and patients who do not believe that following their eye care providers' advice can help their vision.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of (a) a glaucoma medication self-efficacy scale and (b) a glaucoma outcome expectations scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two instruments were developed: a glaucoma medication self-efficacy scale and a glaucoma outcome expectations scale. Packets containing (a) the instruments and patient demographic questions and (b) a letter explaining the study were distributed to 225 glaucomapatients from three ophthalmology practices between August and December 2007. The instrument was completed by 191 patients for a response rate of 85%. Principal components factor analysis with a varimax rotation and Cronbach's alpha reliability were used to analyse the data. To assess discriminant validity, we administered the scales and two self-reported measures of adherence in a separate sample of 43 glaucomapatients who were currently using at least one glaucoma medication. RESULTS: Our results yielded a 21-item self-efficacy in overcoming barriers that might interfere with the use of glaucoma medications scale, a 14-item self-efficacy in carrying out specific tasks required to use eye drops correctly scale, and a four-item glaucoma outcome expectations scale. Results of the Cronbach's alpha reliability indicated that the scales are internally consistent. The self-efficacy scales were both significantly associated with two patient self-reported measures of glaucoma medication adherence, which show discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: Eye care providers and researchers can use these scales to identify patients with low self-efficacy in using their glaucoma medications and patients who do not believe that following their eye care providers' advice can help their vision.
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Olivia Killeen; Sarah Miller; Chamisa MacKenzie; Leslie M Niziol; Ken Resnicow; John W Creswell; Paul Cook; Michele Heisler Journal: Health Commun Date: 2018-12-20
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Susan Blalock; David Covert; Jennifer L Stone; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Kelly Muir; Alan L Robin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Susan J Blalock; Delesha M Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Catherine Slota; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Gail Tudor; Jason A Goldsmith; Alan L Robin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Alan L Robin; Taylor Blachley; Karen Farris; Michele Heisler; Ken Resnicow; Paul P Lee Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Delesha M Carpenter; Gail E Tudor; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Betsy L Sleath Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-07-06
Authors: B Sleath; D M Carpenter; S J Blalock; R Sayner; K W Muir; C Slota; A L Giangiacomo; M E Hartnett; G Tudor; A L Robin Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2015-09-02
Authors: Robyn Sayner; Delesha M Carpenter; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Michelle Vitko; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Gail Tudor; Jason A Goldsmith; Betsy Sleath Journal: Int J Pharm Pract Date: 2015-08-25
Authors: Delesha M Carpenter; Susan J Blalock; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Alan L Robin; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Gail E Tudor; Betsy L Sleath Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.973